Biomedical Optical Spectroscopy and Diagnostics 2000
DOI: 10.1364/bosd.2000.suc3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Intravascular Imaging with OCT: Comparison with Ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confirmation of complete stent apposition to the arterial wall immediately after deployment is important to reduce the incidence of late stent thrombosis [2]. Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (IVOCT) is a recently developed imaging modality with high axial resolution (5-15 μm) and sufficient tissue penetration depth of 1.5-2.0 mm to allow stent apposition assessment [3][4][5][6][7]. Although IVOCT does not penetrate tissue as deep as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), finer image resolution of one order-of-magnitude allows IVOCT to provide stent apposition information that IVUS cannot offer and therefore gives IVOCT an important advantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confirmation of complete stent apposition to the arterial wall immediately after deployment is important to reduce the incidence of late stent thrombosis [2]. Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (IVOCT) is a recently developed imaging modality with high axial resolution (5-15 μm) and sufficient tissue penetration depth of 1.5-2.0 mm to allow stent apposition assessment [3][4][5][6][7]. Although IVOCT does not penetrate tissue as deep as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), finer image resolution of one order-of-magnitude allows IVOCT to provide stent apposition information that IVUS cannot offer and therefore gives IVOCT an important advantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%