2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2008.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo maintenance of synergistic cytarabine:daunorubicin ratios greatly enhances therapeutic efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
227
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
227
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1A). Although combination treatments can provide many advantages, the degree of synergism/antagonism between drugs in combination treatments can vary significantly with the drug ratio (2,11). Hence, to determine the optimal drug loading of each therapeutic into the nanoparticle, it is essential to first determine the ratio of free drugs that will yield the maximum synergy in vitro.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1A). Although combination treatments can provide many advantages, the degree of synergism/antagonism between drugs in combination treatments can vary significantly with the drug ratio (2,11). Hence, to determine the optimal drug loading of each therapeutic into the nanoparticle, it is essential to first determine the ratio of free drugs that will yield the maximum synergy in vitro.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, by incorporating two or more drugs into the same nanoparticle, their rate of release, biodistribution, and metabolism can be controlled so that the optimal synergistic ratio can be attained at the tumor site for improved therapeutic efficacy (11). Thus, utilizing nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles for combinatorial therapeutics can have a significant impact on patient outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; V) are nanotherapeutics really effective, or do they only lower toxicity? Shouldn't we consider integrating nanotherapeutics in combined modality regimens (Figure 2D-F; [32][33][34][35][36][37])? ; VI) how important is solid tumor treatment from a clinical point of view?…”
Section: Therapeutic Nanomedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…from different types of sarcomas (R), thereby enabling patient preselection and (more) personalized nano-chemotherapeutic treatments. Images are adapted, with permission, from [30,[32][33][34][38][39][40][41][42][50][51][52]. Rationale for image-guided and personalized nanomedicine.…”
Section: Theranostic Nanomedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPX-351 is a liposomal-based experimental drug that results in the delivery of a 5:1 ratio of cytarabine to anthracycline that is maintained for up to 24 h in the bone marrow and blood of leukemia bearing mice and has been shown to result in optimal synergy between these two drugs in preclinical models [35]. The initial experience of CPX-351 in the treatment of 48 patients with relapsed or refractory MDS/AML defined the MTD at 101 U/m 2 when given on days 1, 3, and 5 of an induction cycle, and nine out of the 43 patients with AML achieved a CR.…”
Section: Cpx 351mentioning
confidence: 99%