2010
DOI: 10.4995/wrs.1998.349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Measurement of Body Parts and Fat Deposition in Rabbits by Mri.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the works only showed the R 2 values or CV (%). The R 2 of fat content (g) prediction in this study was higher (0.97) than the values shown by Köver et al [ 11 ], who found an r-value of 0.39 (R 2 = 0.15) using the MRI method. Fekete and Brown [ 12 ] used both TOBEC and the deuterium dioxide method to estimate empty body fat.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the works only showed the R 2 values or CV (%). The R 2 of fat content (g) prediction in this study was higher (0.97) than the values shown by Köver et al [ 11 ], who found an r-value of 0.39 (R 2 = 0.15) using the MRI method. Fekete and Brown [ 12 ] used both TOBEC and the deuterium dioxide method to estimate empty body fat.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The in vivo determination of carcass composition during the growing period could be interesting to study the variation in carcass composition with aging and to determine nutrient retention without slaughtering the animals. Some authors have estimated body composition using in vivo methods in rabbits such as Magnetic Resonance (MRI) [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], and the method of dilution with deuterium oxide (D2O) in rabbit does [ 13 , 14 ]. Milisits et al [ 14 ] also used the Total Body Electrical-Conductivity method (TOBEC) in growing rabbits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KÖVER et al (1998) andPASCUAL et al (2000) also observed a lower precision in the prediction of low fat weight measurements attributed to their greater relative error. On the other hand, a slight underestimation of the PFW was still observed for the animals with more than 120 g of PFW, perhaps related to the diffuse nature of the perirenal fat depots, especially on high fat animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%