2015
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo measurement reproducibility of femoral neck microarchitectural parameters derived from 3T MR images

Abstract: Purpose To evaluate the within-day and between-day measurement reproducibility of in vivo 3-D MRI assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture of the proximal femur. Materials and Methods This HIPPA compliant, IRB approved study was conducted on eleven healthy subjects (mean age = 57.4 ± 14.1 years) with written informed consent. All subjects underwent a 3T MRI hip scan in vivo (0.234 mm × 0.234 mm × 1.5 mm) at three time points: baseline, second scan same day (intra-scan), and third scan one week later (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment of the hip is advantageous not only because the hip is a clinically important fracture site, but also because it allows direct comparison with DXA measurement of BMD, which is performed in the hip as standard-ofcare diagnostic testing. The reproducibility of MR imaging-based microarchitectural analysis in the proximal femur by using this method has been reported previously with root mean square coefficients of variation less than or equal to 7.8% and intraclass correlation coeffficents greater than or equal to 0.931 (40). Because the imaging was performed with a clinical 3-T MR imager and by using a widely available product sequence and a commercially available coil, the method could be implemented widely, even in the nontertiary care or outpatient setting and without the need for special software or hardware modifications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Assessment of the hip is advantageous not only because the hip is a clinically important fracture site, but also because it allows direct comparison with DXA measurement of BMD, which is performed in the hip as standard-ofcare diagnostic testing. The reproducibility of MR imaging-based microarchitectural analysis in the proximal femur by using this method has been reported previously with root mean square coefficients of variation less than or equal to 7.8% and intraclass correlation coeffficents greater than or equal to 0.931 (40). Because the imaging was performed with a clinical 3-T MR imager and by using a widely available product sequence and a commercially available coil, the method could be implemented widely, even in the nontertiary care or outpatient setting and without the need for special software or hardware modifications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Motion artifacts were observed on several images, which decreased the accuracy of identifying the cortical boundaries. Therefore, approaches to reduce motion artifacts such as the use of assistant straps to minimize the patient's mobility or motion‐correction techniques should be implemented in the future. Fourth, cortical porosity is not only regulated by age, gender, BMI, and menopause status, but also related to physical activity or exercise, diet, and other lifestyle factors, which could be confounding factors when analyzing the correlations among parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Chang et al and Hotca et al investigated the reproducibility of quantitative assessment of microarchitectural and mechanical parameters (computed with linear FEA) in the proximal femur at 3T (11-12 subjects, three scans, twice on 1 day and once 1 week later, 3D FLASH, 0.234 3 0.234 3 1.5 mm). 119,120 For microarchitectural parameters, within-day root-mean-square CVs/ICCs ranged from 2.3-7.8%/0.931-0.989 and between-day root mean square CVs/ICC ranged from 4.0-7.3%/0.934-0.971. For mechanical parameters, within and between day root mean square CVs/ICCs ranged from 3.5-6.6%/0.96-0.98.…”
Section: Mri Of Bone Microarchitecture For Assessment Of Fracture Rismentioning
confidence: 99%