2013
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo monitoring of chemically evoked activity patterns in the rat trigeminal ganglion

Abstract: Albeit lacking a sense of smell, anosmic patients maintain a reduced ability to distinguish different volatile chemicals by relying exclusively on their trigeminal system (TS). To elucidate differences in the neuronal representation of these volatile substances in the TS, we performed voltage-sensitive dye imaging (VSDI) in the rat trigeminal ganglion (TG) in vivo. We demonstrated that stimulus-specific patterns of bioelectrical activity occur within the TG upon nasal administration of ten different volatile c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our data show that responses to odor solutions in both OC and GC differ in latency from responses to taste solutions that OC responses are driven by respiration and correlated with responses to the same odorants presented orthonasally. These findings argue against gustatory stimulation being the source of responses to intraoral odorants, although the involvement of the trigeminal system cannot be completely ruled out, as is the case in most studies involving odor stimuli (Lübbert et al 2013;Silver and Moulton 1982). Finally, it is possible that odor-specific mouth movements contribute to the observed neural responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, our data show that responses to odor solutions in both OC and GC differ in latency from responses to taste solutions that OC responses are driven by respiration and correlated with responses to the same odorants presented orthonasally. These findings argue against gustatory stimulation being the source of responses to intraoral odorants, although the involvement of the trigeminal system cannot be completely ruled out, as is the case in most studies involving odor stimuli (Lübbert et al 2013;Silver and Moulton 1982). Finally, it is possible that odor-specific mouth movements contribute to the observed neural responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Odorant activation leads to chemically evoked activity patterns in the TG and higher order neurons in the brain [2224]. Most odorant molecules simultaneously stimulate both, the olfactory and the trigeminal system within the nasal cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that nearly all odorants, particularly at high concentrations, activate intranasal trigeminal nerve fibers and trigeminally innervated respiratory epithelia [ 20 , 21 ]. Odorant activation leads to chemically evoked activity patterns in the TG and higher order neurons in the brain [ 22 24 ]. Most odorant molecules simultaneously stimulate both, the olfactory and the trigeminal system within the nasal cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%