Pancreapedia: Exocrine Pancreas Knowledge Base
DOI: 10.3998/panc.2021.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo Mouse Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(152 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, therapy responses in allograft implantation models can depend on location [92] and used cell lines [93], which leads to interpretations of results being specific to the features of the cell line [94]. There is a multitude of different models used in preclinical PDAC research, ranging from chemically induced models to genetically engineered or implantation models [95,96]. Patient-derived xenograft models are considered a standard in preclinical oncology because the use of human cell lines in treating human cancers is a clear translational advantage [97].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, therapy responses in allograft implantation models can depend on location [92] and used cell lines [93], which leads to interpretations of results being specific to the features of the cell line [94]. There is a multitude of different models used in preclinical PDAC research, ranging from chemically induced models to genetically engineered or implantation models [95,96]. Patient-derived xenograft models are considered a standard in preclinical oncology because the use of human cell lines in treating human cancers is a clear translational advantage [97].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of PDAC allow for investigation into different constituents of the TME, the role of different genes in cancer initiation and progression, and screening for therapeutic targets and resistance mechanisms in immunocompetent mice [26]. These models are based on the Cre/loxP-mediated activation of mutant KRAS (G12D/V) in combination with the inactivation of one or more tumor suppressor genes (e.g., p53, Tgfrb2, Smad4, Ink4a/Arf) driven by the Pdx-1 or P48 promoter expressed by exocrine pancreatic cells.…”
Section: Rationale For Immune Checkpoint Inhibition In Mpdacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are based on the Cre/loxP-mediated activation of mutant KRAS (G12D/V) in combination with the inactivation of one or more tumor suppressor genes (e.g., p53, Tgfrb2, Smad4, Ink4a/Arf) driven by the Pdx-1 or P48 promoter expressed by exocrine pancreatic cells. Depending on the inactivated tumor suppressor gene, these models recapitulate different characteristics of human PDAC [26].…”
Section: Rationale For Immune Checkpoint Inhibition In Mpdacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms that contribute to KRAS G12D -mediated PDAC progression, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) have been generated that allow spatial and temporal induction of KRAS G12D (49). A wide range of GEMMs exist, recapitulating the key features and mutations seen in human PDAC, including those allowing activation of KRAS G12D in combination with the inactivation of p16 , p53 or Smad4 , or with hereditary Brca1 and Brca2 mutations (4,10). While initial models focused on generating mutations in key genes during embryonic development, more recent GEMMs have focused on inducible, acinar-specific expression of KRAS G12D , which is more representative of the spontaneous mutations seen in patients (1114).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%