2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Repair of a Protein Underlying a Neurological Disorder by Programmable RNA Editing

Abstract: SUMMARY Programmable RNA editing is gaining momentum as an approach to repair mutations, but its efficiency in repairing endogenous mutant RNA in complex tissue is unknown. Here we apply this approach to the brain and successfully repair a guanosine-to-adenosine mutation in methyl CpG binding protein 2 RNA that causes the neurodevelopmental disease Rett syndrome. Repair is mediated by hippocampal injections of juvenile Mecp2 317G>A mice with an adeno-associate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main approaches, firstly that of addressing downstream effects of the MECP2 mutation, for instance attempting to upregulate genes under MeCP2’s control, such as BDNF or IGF1 [reviewed in Vashi and Justice (2019) ], or neurotransmitter pathways such as NMDA receptors, or downstream target K + /Cl – co-transporter 2 (KCC2) ( Tang et al, 2019 ). The second approach is to target MECP2 directly, either through gene therapy, delivering a functional version of the MECP2 gene exogenously, for example using adenoviral delivery systems [e.g., ( Tillotson et al, 2017 )], through correcting the mutation at the level of genomic DNA, for example using CRISPR/cas9 editing, or at the RNA level by programmable RNA editing (e.g., Sinnamon et al, 2020 ), or using compounds such as aminoglycosides to enable “read-through” of MECP2 nonsense mutations [e.g., ( Merritt et al, 2020 )].…”
Section: Subsectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main approaches, firstly that of addressing downstream effects of the MECP2 mutation, for instance attempting to upregulate genes under MeCP2’s control, such as BDNF or IGF1 [reviewed in Vashi and Justice (2019) ], or neurotransmitter pathways such as NMDA receptors, or downstream target K + /Cl – co-transporter 2 (KCC2) ( Tang et al, 2019 ). The second approach is to target MECP2 directly, either through gene therapy, delivering a functional version of the MECP2 gene exogenously, for example using adenoviral delivery systems [e.g., ( Tillotson et al, 2017 )], through correcting the mutation at the level of genomic DNA, for example using CRISPR/cas9 editing, or at the RNA level by programmable RNA editing (e.g., Sinnamon et al, 2020 ), or using compounds such as aminoglycosides to enable “read-through” of MECP2 nonsense mutations [e.g., ( Merritt et al, 2020 )].…”
Section: Subsectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first report on Mecp2 RNA editing was published by the Gail Mandel lab in 2017 where an exogenous, modified ADAR2 and guide was used to successfully edit 72% G to A mutations in RNA from Mecp R106Q mouse neurons (Sinnamon et al, 2017). In 2020 Sinnamon and colleagues successfully edited up to 50% of mRNA in neurons in developing brains of Mecp2 mutant mice using a similar approach (Sinnamon et al, 2020). The potential of RNA editing as a Rett therapy is limited by the fact that although endogenous RNA editing proteins such as ADAR1, exist naturally in the brain, current approaches express a modified RNA editing protein delivered by an AAV virus and the fact that these ADAR2 like proteins primarily edit only G to A mutations (Sinnamon et al, 2017(Sinnamon et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Potential Treatments Under Development For Rett Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of RNA editing can be improved by using chemically modified sgRNA and a next-generation viral delivery vector or nanoparticle. For example, AAV delivery of exogenous RNA editor and guide sequence has enabled in vivo repair of mutant RNAs in mouse models of neurological disease 190 . Compared with gene editing, RNA editing also makes limited kinds of change to RNA.…”
Section: Other Gene Knock-in and Gene Correction Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%