2010
DOI: 10.2174/1876388x01002010171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Stem Cell Imaging

Abstract: Abstract:In recent years, the emerging and advances of non-invasive in vivo stem cell imaging has significantly contributed to the real-time tracking of transplanted stem cells as well as monitoring their proliferation, migration and persistence in live animals and ultimately possibly in humans. This review summarized the different in vivo imaging modalities for imaging stem cell, especially for its monitoring viability, death and proliferation; and discussed the strategies of combined multimodality approaches… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our data about MSC distribution sites and kinetics are consistent with commonly accepted ideas. However, MSC biodistribution studies in vivo are generally limited to 7 to 10 days because the methods of MRI and PET typically used in these studies require labeling of the cells with exogenous contrast agents that are often degraded, diluted, and excreted as cell populations divide [ 23 , 24 ]. In our research, we applied bioluminescence imaging to track MSCs-luc2 cells in living mice and showed survival (and possibly proliferation) of MSCs in the body for at least 7 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, our data about MSC distribution sites and kinetics are consistent with commonly accepted ideas. However, MSC biodistribution studies in vivo are generally limited to 7 to 10 days because the methods of MRI and PET typically used in these studies require labeling of the cells with exogenous contrast agents that are often degraded, diluted, and excreted as cell populations divide [ 23 , 24 ]. In our research, we applied bioluminescence imaging to track MSCs-luc2 cells in living mice and showed survival (and possibly proliferation) of MSCs in the body for at least 7 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, in vivo optical imaging has been increasingly used to visualize the distribution of transplanted MSCs in the recipient’s body, track their migration to the tumor site, and monitor subsequent proliferation [ 23 ]. Transduction of the stem cells with reporter genes encoding bioluminescent or fluorescent protein provides long-term observation of living cell populations in the animal at the whole-body level [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, fluorescence imaging detects reporter molecule amounts that are in the range of 10 −9 –10 −12 M (Zhao et al, ). Also in favor of bioluminescence is its signal‐to‐noise ratio which is high for luciferase‐based systems, but low for fluorescent proteins (Choy et al, ; Zhao et al, ). Furthermore, as a result of codon optimization, the expression of Luc2, is considerably higher than that of the commonly used wild‐type firefly luciferase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells are labeled in advance with contrast agents such as gadoliniumdiethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for short-term monitoring for upto a week, or superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) for long-term monitoring (reviewed in [102]). Since these contrast agents are exogenous and are often degraded, efforts to develop suitable reporter genes such as the transferrin receptor (TfR) gene that is highly expressed on the target cell membrane have been done for years, however the field is still in its early stage [103,104].…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Mri)mentioning
confidence: 99%