2019
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo validity of proximal caries detection in primary teeth, with histological validation

Abstract: Background Detection and diagnosis of proximal caries in primary molars are challenging. Aim The aim of this in vivo study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of four methods of proximal caries detection in primary molar teeth. Design Eighty‐two children (5‐10 years) were recruited. Initially, 1030 proximal surfaces were examined using meticulous visual examination (ICDAS) (VE1), bitewing radiographs (RE), and a laser fluorescence pen device (LF1). Temporary tooth separation (TTS) was achieved for 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis of the site of caries occurrence, depends on various factors. Subka S et al, 2019 10 have stated that the tight contact points between proximal surfaces of primary molars lead to higher plaque accumulation thus contributing to initiation and progression of proximal carious lesions. Moreover, the presence or absence of generalized spaces (Baume spaces) in primary dentition also leads to proximal lesions as there are primate spaces mesial to upper canine and distal to lower primary canine in mandibular arch because of which in mandibular primary first molar (D), distal surface has tight proximal contacts in comparison to the mesial surface thus leading to increased prevalence of caries (Addy M, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of the site of caries occurrence, depends on various factors. Subka S et al, 2019 10 have stated that the tight contact points between proximal surfaces of primary molars lead to higher plaque accumulation thus contributing to initiation and progression of proximal carious lesions. Moreover, the presence or absence of generalized spaces (Baume spaces) in primary dentition also leads to proximal lesions as there are primate spaces mesial to upper canine and distal to lower primary canine in mandibular arch because of which in mandibular primary first molar (D), distal surface has tight proximal contacts in comparison to the mesial surface thus leading to increased prevalence of caries (Addy M, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, 18,19,22,25,26,[36][37][38][39] However, weak specif icit y and sensitiv it y results led other authors to not indicate its use without BW or CT, invalidating the aim of the studies about these appliances. 18,22,[27][28][29][40][41][42][43][44] A study by Subka et al 44 Kühnisch et al 45 and Ozkan et al 46…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma vez que a combinação possuí maior sensibilidade para a identificação de lesões de cárie D1 (cárie de esmalte e dentina). Conforme o estudo, para a identificação meticulosa da cárie (D3), o ICDAS deve ser apoiado por radiografia, visto que apresentam o melhor desempenho para a detecção de lesões na dentina (Subka et al, 2019). O ensaio clínico foi desenvolvido para investigar a eficácia de um novo agente anticárie, o fluoreto de nanoprata (Nanosilver Fluoride -NSF), na prevenção e interrupção da cárie em crianças.…”
Section: Avaliação Clínicaunclassified