2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-012-9201-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In your Facebook: Examining Facebook usage as misbehavior on perceived teacher credibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These figures include high levels of SoMe activity among undergraduate students for educational as well as social purposes (Ali, 2016;Guraya, 2016;Knight-McCord et al, 2016;Roblyer, McDaniel, Webb, Herman, & Witty, 2010;Tess, 2013) and such usage parallels the availability of remote SoMe access achieved through uptake in smart devices (Buchholz, Perry, Weiss, & Cooley, 2016;Evrim, 2014;Gökçearslan, Mumcu, Haşlaman, & Çevik, 2016;Ozdalga, Ozdalga, & Ahuja, 2012;Ponce, Méndez, & Peñalvo, 2014). In the early to mid2000s, SoMe and Web 2.0 arose as new, exciting and innovative technologies (Boyd & Ellison, 2007) that instructors began to incorporate into educational activities (Booth & Hultén, 2003;Mazer, Murphy, & Simonds, 2007) and the increasing interest in SoMe during this period is reflected in the volume of educational literature on this topic (Asiri & Househ, 2016;Aydin, 2012;Kakushi & Evora, 2016;Lafferty & Manca, 2015;McAndrew & Johnston, 2012;Pander, Pinilla, Dimitriadis, & Fischer, 2014;& Cochran, 2012), blurring of the staff-student boundary (Mazer et al, 2007); unprofessional usage (Kitsis et al, 2016); and impacts on lecturer credibility (Hutchens & Hayes, 2014). Barriers can also exist at the institutional level in terms of a culture in HE that has been described as resistant to the uptake of new technologies (Bonzo & Parchoma, 2010;Roblyer et al, 2010;Selwyn, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These figures include high levels of SoMe activity among undergraduate students for educational as well as social purposes (Ali, 2016;Guraya, 2016;Knight-McCord et al, 2016;Roblyer, McDaniel, Webb, Herman, & Witty, 2010;Tess, 2013) and such usage parallels the availability of remote SoMe access achieved through uptake in smart devices (Buchholz, Perry, Weiss, & Cooley, 2016;Evrim, 2014;Gökçearslan, Mumcu, Haşlaman, & Çevik, 2016;Ozdalga, Ozdalga, & Ahuja, 2012;Ponce, Méndez, & Peñalvo, 2014). In the early to mid2000s, SoMe and Web 2.0 arose as new, exciting and innovative technologies (Boyd & Ellison, 2007) that instructors began to incorporate into educational activities (Booth & Hultén, 2003;Mazer, Murphy, & Simonds, 2007) and the increasing interest in SoMe during this period is reflected in the volume of educational literature on this topic (Asiri & Househ, 2016;Aydin, 2012;Kakushi & Evora, 2016;Lafferty & Manca, 2015;McAndrew & Johnston, 2012;Pander, Pinilla, Dimitriadis, & Fischer, 2014;& Cochran, 2012), blurring of the staff-student boundary (Mazer et al, 2007); unprofessional usage (Kitsis et al, 2016); and impacts on lecturer credibility (Hutchens & Hayes, 2014). Barriers can also exist at the institutional level in terms of a culture in HE that has been described as resistant to the uptake of new technologies (Bonzo & Parchoma, 2010;Roblyer et al, 2010;Selwyn, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the ever growing diffusion of open social network sites, first among university students and, at a later stage, among secondary school students, issues related to the relationship between students and teachers (Bosch 2009;Cheung and Vogel 2011;Madge et al 2009;Selwyn 2009) and how to behave appropriately in these sites have been investigated in several studies (Callaghan and Bower 2012;Hershkovitz and Forkosh-Baruch 2013;Forkosh-Baruch and Hershkovitz 2014;Ha and Shin 2014;Hutchens and Hayes 2014;Mazer et al 2007Mazer et al , 2009.…”
Section: Background and Rationale Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a research study conducted by Hutchens and Hayes (2014), the authors examined whether educator usage of Facebook had any impact on student perceptions of instructor credibility. Results show that creating a Facebook account does not automatically mean that instructors will be perceived as less credible by students.…”
Section: Background and Rationale Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we are aware that the use of Facebook in teaching can be a somewhat divisive topic, particularly relating to concerns about appropriateness (Wang, Scown, Urquhart, & Hardman, 2014) and privacy where staff are using this to communicate with students, we believe that we countered this by suggesting that they should use whichever means of communication they felt comfortable with. Our group was there primarily for tutors to stimulate discussion if this was not occurring naturally between the students, and the tutors involved created separate Facebook profiles for university purposes, which did not contain any personal information, and thus ensured that our professional and personal lives were kept distinct (Barcyzk & Duncan, 2012;Hutchens & Hayes, 2014) Furthermore, the use of Facebook has been found to be more practical than using online discussion boards which may be unwieldy, and to be more suited to the way in which students prefer to engage with technology (Abrahamse et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Use Of Technology In Higher Education Teaching and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%