1995
DOI: 10.1016/1047-2797(95)00036-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inaccuracy of self-reported weights and heights among American Indian adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
62
2
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
62
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since overweight subjects appeared to have the high levels of under-reporting BMI this might also contribute to the explanation of our results. Th e percentage of overweight subjects is not reported in every reviewed study on validity of self-reported height and weight, but in two there are comparable percentages of overweight subjects (34-44% and 33%) and also relatively high under-reporting of weight (1.5 and 1.6 kg for boys and 2.1 and 3.5 kg for girls) [13,15] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since overweight subjects appeared to have the high levels of under-reporting BMI this might also contribute to the explanation of our results. Th e percentage of overweight subjects is not reported in every reviewed study on validity of self-reported height and weight, but in two there are comparable percentages of overweight subjects (34-44% and 33%) and also relatively high under-reporting of weight (1.5 and 1.6 kg for boys and 2.1 and 3.5 kg for girls) [13,15] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Himes and Faricy [14] also report high percentages of missing data in 12-to 13-year-olds in the NHANES III study (41 and 25%, respectively), Hauck et al [13] report 16-17% missing data in a sample of Indian-Americans and Shannon et al [16] 1991 report 10% implausible or missing data in a sample of sixth graders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusions: Among overweight children and adolescents aged 8 -18 years, this pilot study suggests that self-reports of height, weight, and Tanner stages are not valid proxy measures for a physician's assessment. The validity and reliability of self-reported height, weight [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], and sexual maturation ratings [7-16] among children and adolescents have been studied to determine whether they can be applied to epidemiological and clinical research. Most studies have compared self-reports of height, weight [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], and sexual maturity [7-14] with a physician's assessment of adolescents of normal weight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity and reliability of self-reported height, weight [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], and sexual maturation ratings [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] among children and adolescents have been studied to determine whether they can be applied to epidemiological and clinical research. Most studies have compared self-reports of height, weight [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], and sexual maturity [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] with a physician's assessment of adolescents of normal weight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation