1976
DOI: 10.1128/aem.31.6.836-846.1976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation kinetics of some microorganisms subjected to a variety of stresses

Abstract: Loss of viability in aerosols of Escherichia coli B, E. coli commune, E. coli Jepp (in nitrogen atmospheres), and Semliki forest virus (in air) was determined as a function of relative humidity at 26.5 C. The decay patterns could be accounted for accurately by means of an equation derived from a postulated mechanism involving population distributions and first-order denaturation kinetics. Analyses of published curves describing loss of viability (all of which were semiexponential, ie., J-shaped) for various mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…'Shouldering' refers to an increase of UV 254 dose with no corresponding increase in microbial inactivation, whereas 'tailing' is a decrease in UV 254 dose with no corresponding decrease in microbial inactivation (Hiatt, 1964). In contrast to the one-stage inactivation model, the two-stage model proposes that exposure of microbial populations to an inactivating agent may reveal two subpopulations: one subpopulation (f) more susceptible to inactivation and a second subpopulation (1-f) more resistant (Hiatt, 1964;Cox, 1976;Kowalski et al, 2002).…”
Section: Chick's Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…'Shouldering' refers to an increase of UV 254 dose with no corresponding increase in microbial inactivation, whereas 'tailing' is a decrease in UV 254 dose with no corresponding decrease in microbial inactivation (Hiatt, 1964). In contrast to the one-stage inactivation model, the two-stage model proposes that exposure of microbial populations to an inactivating agent may reveal two subpopulations: one subpopulation (f) more susceptible to inactivation and a second subpopulation (1-f) more resistant (Hiatt, 1964;Cox, 1976;Kowalski et al, 2002).…”
Section: Chick's Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘Shouldering’ refers to an increase of UV 254 dose with no corresponding increase in microbial inactivation, whereas ‘tailing’ is a decrease in UV 254 dose with no corresponding decrease in microbial inactivation (Hiatt, 1964). In contrast to the one-stage inactivation model, the two-stage model proposes that exposure of microbial populations to an inactivating agent may reveal two subpopulations: one subpopulation ( f ) more susceptible to inactivation and a second subpopulation (1– f ) more resistant (Hiatt, 1964; Cox, 1976; Kowalski et al , 2002). where N t is the quantity of virus in the test sample after treatment with Dose t , N 0 is the quantity of virus in the unexposed control sample, f is the resistant fraction of the total initial virus population with inactivation rate K 2 , (1– f ) is the susceptible virus population fraction with inactivation rate K 1 , k 1 is the inactivation rate of the inactivation curve for the ‘fast decay population’, k 2 is the inactivation rate of the inactivation curve for the ‘resistant population’ and Dose t is the UV 254 intensity×time.…”
Section: Principles Of Inactivation By Uv Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penetration into the alveolar region, in particular, is highly variable, and it is unclear whether the liquid delivered with the pathogenic agent might alter lung physiology, further complicating matters. Studies using aerosols of F. tularensis were employed extensively in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). There has been renewed interest in F. tularensis since letters containing anthrax were sent in 2001.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This liquid/gas jet is further impacted against the inside of the Collison nebulizer jar to remove the larger fraction of the droplets from the aerosol (May 1973). The susceptibility of bacilli to nebulization has been shown to affect viability in the suspended aerosol (Cox 1976; Griffiths et al. 1996; Heidelberg et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%