2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00083-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of E2F3 results in centrosome amplification

Abstract: The E2F family of transcription factors is critical for the control of cell cycle progression. We now show that the specific inactivation of E2F3 in mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) results in a disruption of the centrosome duplication cycle. Loss of E2F3, but not E2F1, E2F2, E2F4, or E2F5 results in unregulated cyclin E-dependent kinase activity, defects in nucleophosmin B association with centrosomes, and premature centriole separation and duplication. Consequently, this defect leads to centrosome amplificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in the absence of cooperating hits, the same growthpromoting mutations found in cancers typically trigger these events in primary cells (30). For example, overexpression of E2Fs in primary cells also leads to p53-dependent apoptosis, polyploidy, and growth arrest (19,31,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in the absence of cooperating hits, the same growthpromoting mutations found in cancers typically trigger these events in primary cells (30). For example, overexpression of E2Fs in primary cells also leads to p53-dependent apoptosis, polyploidy, and growth arrest (19,31,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 This may be related to the finding that E2F3 deficiency leads to centrosome amplification and genetic instability. 35 Inactivation of E2F3 has not www.landesbioscience.com…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 and 14. Removal of the E2F3 alleles of E2F1 Ϫ/Ϫ E2F2 Ϫ/Ϫ E2F3 f/f MEFs (15,16) was achieved by infecting cells with retrovirus particles encoding a ''self-excising'' CRE recombinase (36) and was used for ChIP 2 days later. Chromatin was immunoprecipitated with histone tail-specific modifications antibodies (#06942, #07213, #07214, #07215, #07404, #07080, #07405, and #07212; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), ␣-CARM1 (#07080; Upstate Biotechnology), ␣-PRMT1 (AB7027; Abcam, Cambridge, MA), ␣-PRMT5 [mix of BD#611539 (Becton Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium) and #07405 (Upstate Biotechnology)], ␣-SP1 (sc59; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and anti-ACTR/AIB1 (BD#611105; Becton Dickinson).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCNE1 gene transcription is undetectable in G 0 and G 1 phases of the cell cycle, whereas it rises sharply during a narrow window of time that precedes each entry into S phase. Several pieces of evidence suggest that the periodic association of activators E2Fs-and E2F-pocket protein complexes regulate CCNE1 gene expression (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). E2F complexes bound to this gene were found to recruit chromatin modifiers, including members of the SNF2-like helicase family, type I histone deacetylases, the acetyltransferase CBP͞p300, the lysine methyl transferase SUVAR39H1, and the protein arginine N-methyltransferase (PRMT) 5 (7, 9-14, 17, 18), suggesting that they foster periodic chromatin remodeling of the CCNE1 promoter region (11,12,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%