2008
DOI: 10.2175/193864708788735196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of Microbial Indicators by the Sequential Chlorination Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments were performed with nitrified secondary effluent, both filtered and unfiltered, from the SJCEWRP and the San Jose Creek West WRP (SJCWWRP). This paper summarizes previously reported results on DBPs (Huitric et al, 2006;Huitric et al, 2007;Huitric et al, 2010) and on disinfection efficacy of poliovirus, MS2, and total coliform (Huitric et al, 2008;Huitric et al, 2010;Huitric et al, 2013) and demonstrates the advantages of using sequential chlorination (a multi-barrier disinfection method) over free chlorine or chloramines alone.…”
Section: Figure 2 Schematic Diagram Of Cdph Approved Sequential Chlosupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Experiments were performed with nitrified secondary effluent, both filtered and unfiltered, from the SJCEWRP and the San Jose Creek West WRP (SJCWWRP). This paper summarizes previously reported results on DBPs (Huitric et al, 2006;Huitric et al, 2007;Huitric et al, 2010) and on disinfection efficacy of poliovirus, MS2, and total coliform (Huitric et al, 2008;Huitric et al, 2010;Huitric et al, 2013) and demonstrates the advantages of using sequential chlorination (a multi-barrier disinfection method) over free chlorine or chloramines alone.…”
Section: Figure 2 Schematic Diagram Of Cdph Approved Sequential Chlosupporting
confidence: 68%
“…MS2 coliphage is relatively resistant to chloramines (Shang et al, 2007;Cooper et al, 2000;Shin and Sobsey, 1998;Staub et al, 1995), therefore it is not a good indicator for virus inactivation by chloramines. At the range of TCRCT tested in the sequential chlorination experiments, previous laboratory experiment results, shown in Figure 6, suggested that chloramines would inactivate at least 1 log poliovirus (Huitric et al, 2008). Step 1 -Free Chlorine…”
Section: Sequential Chlorination Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Since sequential chlorination uses free chlorine, which is a stronger disinfectant than chloramines, it is expected that the process would achieve the 5-log virus inactivation required by Title 22 at CT values lower than 450 mg Cl 2 -min/L. This was demonstrated in bench-scale experiments using effluent samples from two water reclamation plants operated by the Districts (Huitric et al, 2008). In the current study, the Districts conducted pilot-scale experiments to demonstrate virus inactivation by the sequential chlorination process.…”
Section: Figure 2 Sequential Chlorination and Chlorine Residual Controlmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Chloramines minimize formation of trihalomethanes (THMs) and provide additional bacterial and viral inactivation. Plant-scale testing has shown that the process significantly reduces NDMA formation in comparison to chloramination, generates insignificant amounts of cyanide, and does not cause aquatic toxicity (Huitric et al, 2007, Huitric et al, 2008, Maguin et al, 2009. To obtain Title 22 approval for sequential chlorination, the Districts needed to demonstrate that the process can achieve >5-log virus inactivation when it is used to disinfect filtered effluent.…”
Section: Figure 1 -The Districts' Wastewater Treatment Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%