2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in fresh beef by electrolytically-generated hypochlorous acid, peroxyacetic acid, lactic acid and caprylic acid

Abstract: Please cite this article as: M. Cap, S. Vaudagna, M. Mozgovoj, et al., Inactivation of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in fresh beef by electrolytically-generated hypochlorous acid, peroxyacetic acid, lactic acid and caprylic acid, Meat Science,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the improvement measures implemented were helpful to reduce significantly stx presence in the final beef product, they were not enough to achieve zero stx presence. Experimental studies conducted in beef found significant decreases in stx detection and STEC count after organic acid (caprylic, lactic and peroxyacetic) application (Cap et al, 2019). However, it was only possible to reduce less than 1 log of STEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the improvement measures implemented were helpful to reduce significantly stx presence in the final beef product, they were not enough to achieve zero stx presence. Experimental studies conducted in beef found significant decreases in stx detection and STEC count after organic acid (caprylic, lactic and peroxyacetic) application (Cap et al, 2019). However, it was only possible to reduce less than 1 log of STEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nagel et al [29] presented significantly lower S. Typhimurium and C. jejuni counts on inoculated poultry carcasses after treatments with 400 ppm or 1000 ppm PAA in a post-chill immersion tank, whereas Ellebracht et al [28] or Penney et al [52] treated beef with 200 ppm or 180 ppm PAA, respectively, resulting in significant reductions of E. coli and S. Typhimurium counts (only Ellebracht et al [28]). In similar experiments, Cap et al [53] presented significant reductions of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. The different study conditions, the varying susceptibilities of the used bacteria, and particularly the meat matrix may have caused the different effects also within the present study.…”
Section: Effects Of Paa and Uv-c Treatments On The Microbiological Survival On Pork During Storagementioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the present study, PAA at 500–2000 ppm for 1 and 5 min on chicken breast led to HCoV-229E reduction values of 1.03–2.13 and 0.85–2.58 log 10 TCID 50 /mL, respectively. Cap et al (2019) showed that the Shiga toxin-producing E. coli population on beef samples decreased by 0.21 log 10 CFU/g after exposure to 200 ppm PAA for 15 s. At 200 and 400 ppm for 30 s, the E. coli O157:H7 counts on beef chucks were reduced by 0.71 and 0.84 log 10 CFU/g, respectively ( Visvalingam & Holley, 2018 ). Moreover, Salmonella reductions on chicken skin were 2.08 and 2.59 log 10 CFU/g following treatment with PAA at 700 and 1400 ppm for 15 s, respectively ( Laranja et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%