2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inadequate reporting of COVID-19 clinical studies: a renewed rationale for the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This continuing gender imbalance reflects the gendered nature of the healthcare profession, and not a genderspecific recruitment strategy of the trials. The SAGER Guidelines recommend that future clinical trials design recruitment strategies to include equal representation of women and men from the outset [8,9]. Sex and gender are important variables in clinical research, and are highly relevant in vaccine research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This continuing gender imbalance reflects the gendered nature of the healthcare profession, and not a genderspecific recruitment strategy of the trials. The SAGER Guidelines recommend that future clinical trials design recruitment strategies to include equal representation of women and men from the outset [8,9]. Sex and gender are important variables in clinical research, and are highly relevant in vaccine research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies reveal that sex and gender are poorly incorporated into COVID-19 research. A recent review of COVID-19 clinical trials showed poor reporting of sex and gender dimensions, with no justification for the lack of such analysis [9]. Many COVID-19 vaccine trials had not been published at the time of this analysis and were not captured in the previous publication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical journals and editors, as well as public health bodies, should redouble their efforts in enforcing recognition of sex/gender in reporting of COVID-19 research ( 65 , 86 ) including enforcement of policies or endorsed guidelines and instructions and advice for peer reviewers…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Immunisation Research and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of focus on sex/gender aligns with findings of a recently published review of COVID-19 clinical trials of drug-based and biological/vaccine interventions, which found that only 18% of trials reported sex-disaggregated results or subgroup analyses (63). Another review published in early 2021 concluded that there was inadequate reporting of sex/ gender in COVID-19 clinical studies, that main outcomes were rarely reported or analysed by sex/gender, and this absence was seldom justified (65). We recognise the challenges in ensuring adequate sample sizes in clinical research to conduct subgroup analyses, particularly when considering rarer adverse events.…”
Section: Reporting Of Sex/gender-disaggregated Datasupporting
confidence: 56%