2013
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.m2012354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inapplicability of the Hencky Formalism to the Description of Large Deformations in Shear

Abstract: One of the problems associated with the use of the Hencky equivalent strain in the analysis of experiments in large shear is that it cannot be paired with a work-conjugate equivalent stress. A further problem is associated with the observation that the textures developed in shear differ sharply from those formed during tension or compression, so that the rates of work hardening are also different. The effects of these differences on the von Mises equivalent stress/equivalent strain flow curves determined by te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27) However, Onaka 25) pointed out that the version recommended by Jonas and his co-workers, £= ffiffi ffi 3 p , is indeed a nominal equivalent strain which is not appropriate when we deal with large deformation. Moreover, we feel that the current results shown in Fig.…”
Section: Inflection Point Observed In Vickers Hardness Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27) However, Onaka 25) pointed out that the version recommended by Jonas and his co-workers, £= ffiffi ffi 3 p , is indeed a nominal equivalent strain which is not appropriate when we deal with large deformation. Moreover, we feel that the current results shown in Fig.…”
Section: Inflection Point Observed In Vickers Hardness Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] For similar reasons, the Hencky-based work is inconsistent with the heat generated during testing. [8] For similar reasons, the Hencky-based work is inconsistent with the heat generated during testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%