1975
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1975.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inappropriate production of collagen and prolyl hydroxylase by human breast cancer cells in vivo

Abstract: Summary.-Thirty-two scirrhous cancers of breast have been examined to determine the origin of the collagen stroma in these tumours. Employing two immunohistochemical techniques it has been shown that the malignant epithelial cells in 30 of these tumours contain not only collagen but also prolyl hydroxylase, a key enzyme in collagen biosynthesis. Neither this enzyme nor collagen was detectable in the spindle cells in the stroma of these tumours. Neither the epithelium in normal breast, that in fibrocystic disea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been considerable controversy as to whether the tumour cells themselves (Al-Adanani et al, 1975;Niitsu et al, 1988), or the fibroblasts in the vicinity of the tumour cells, are stimulated to produce type I collagen (Barsky et al, 1982;Ohtani et al, 1992;Hewitt et al, 1993). Early studies claimed that the excess production of type I collagen is not due to increased collagen synthesis by the stromal fibroblasts, but that it is produced by the breast cancer cells themselves, which suggested that this response was an inappropriate rather than a deliberate host response (Al-Adanani et al, 1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been considerable controversy as to whether the tumour cells themselves (Al-Adanani et al, 1975;Niitsu et al, 1988), or the fibroblasts in the vicinity of the tumour cells, are stimulated to produce type I collagen (Barsky et al, 1982;Ohtani et al, 1992;Hewitt et al, 1993). Early studies claimed that the excess production of type I collagen is not due to increased collagen synthesis by the stromal fibroblasts, but that it is produced by the breast cancer cells themselves, which suggested that this response was an inappropriate rather than a deliberate host response (Al-Adanani et al, 1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies claimed that the excess production of type I collagen is not due to increased collagen synthesis by the stromal fibroblasts, but that it is produced by the breast cancer cells themselves, which suggested that this response was an inappropriate rather than a deliberate host response (Al-Adanani et al, 1975). Subsequent studies have shown that stromal fibroblasts do, in fact, produce the excess collagen and that the epithelial cells are not responsible for the desmoplastic effect (Barsky et al, 1982;Ohtani et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such cell types were not observed except very occasionally in the region of the tumor. Therefore, from our results, we find it hard to believe that the occa sional fibroblasts which are found scattered in the It has been suggested that the stroma of cancers at various sites such as the breast, esophagus, and stomach are the product of the tumor cells [Shivas and Macken zie, 1974;Al-Adnani et al, 1975;Battifora, 1976;Sakakibara et al, 1982;Al-Zuhair et al, 1986]. The present study is yet another confirmation of the involvement of the cancer cells in the production of the various stromal elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Several workers have pointed out that 'infiltrating' carcinoma cells of the breast secrete their own collagen, elastic tissue, and possibly other intermediate fibrillar elements of the stroma inappropriately [Douglas and Shivas, 1974;Shivas and Mackenzie, 1974;Al-Adnani et al, 1975;Albrechtsen et al, 1981;Al-Zuhair et al, 1986], The stroma of cancers at other sites, such as the esophagus and stomach, were occasionally studied [Battifora, 1976;Sakakibara et al, 1982].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In scirrhous carcinoma, there have been divergent opinions for some time whether the mechanism of collagen increase in the tumour is due to primary production by the tumour cells (Sakakibara et al, 1982;Takeuchi, 1976;Roesel et al, 1978;Al-Adnani et al, 1975) or to secondary production by tumour-stimulated fibroblasts (Naito et al, 1984;Yamamoto et al, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%