2009
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2009.075838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inappropriate use and interpretation of D-dimer testing in the emergency department: an unexpected adverse effect of meeting the "4-h target"

Abstract: Implementation of a multifaceted change program reduced the number of D-dimer test requests in both hospitals and may have improved the diagnostic workup for PE at hospital 1. Processes that speed patient transit through the emergency department may impact negatively on other aspects of patient care. This should be the subject of further studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in a setting of low clinical probability, a positive D‐dimer test is likely to result in unnecessary imaging, especially in emergency departments, where D‐dimer tests may be ordered for any patient with shortness of breath or chest pain before they are assessed by a doctor 14 . ‐ 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in a setting of low clinical probability, a positive D‐dimer test is likely to result in unnecessary imaging, especially in emergency departments, where D‐dimer tests may be ordered for any patient with shortness of breath or chest pain before they are assessed by a doctor 14 . ‐ 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,[17][18][19] Lack of extended primary care offi ce hours is associated with increased emergency department use, 13,14 increasing the risk of overly aggressive testing and treatment. 16,17 Failure to offer comprehensive health care is associated with more hospitalizations and specialty referrals, 1 again increasing the likelihood of overly aggressive care. Finally, a patient-centered clinician communication style is associated with less diagnostic testing and fewer specialty referrals, probably by more effectively addressing patient health concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Increased access to these attributes might also minimize unnecessary and potentially harmful care, 1,[11][12][13][14] thereby mitigating iatrogenic mortality. [15][16][17][18][19] We therefore hypothesized greater patient-reported access to these primary care attributes would be associated with decreased subsequent mortality risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Offering patients extended access to their usual source of care might afford earlier diagnosis and treatment of serious health conditions, potentially preventing catastrophic events, and reducing expenditures. Extended offi ce hours might also limit unnecessary patient exposure to higher-acuity (eg, emergency) care and, therefore, to discretionary and potentially harmful testing, treatments, and hospitalizations [3][4][5] initiated by clinicians unfamiliar with their care, which might further reduce expenditures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%