1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1963.tb00787.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inbreeding effect on mortality and morbidity in South Brazilian populations*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consanguineous marriages are still preferred in many major human populations (Bittles, 1994). Consanguineous marriages represent inbreeding in human populations and, as this leads to increased homozygosity, consanguineous marriages due to homozygosity of recessive lethal, sublethal and detrimental alleles result in increased risk of early mortality and morbidity (Morton, 1958;Marcallo et al, 1964). Some authors have, however, highlighted the difficulty in separating genetic effects from the sociological correlates of consanguineous marriages (Morton, Crow & Muller, 1956;Fraser & Biddle, 1976;Alstrom, 1977;Bittles, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consanguineous marriages are still preferred in many major human populations (Bittles, 1994). Consanguineous marriages represent inbreeding in human populations and, as this leads to increased homozygosity, consanguineous marriages due to homozygosity of recessive lethal, sublethal and detrimental alleles result in increased risk of early mortality and morbidity (Morton, 1958;Marcallo et al, 1964). Some authors have, however, highlighted the difficulty in separating genetic effects from the sociological correlates of consanguineous marriages (Morton, Crow & Muller, 1956;Fraser & Biddle, 1976;Alstrom, 1977;Bittles, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1958;Sutter and T a ba h , 1952; M o r t o n , 1961; M a rca llo el al., 1964;Sc h u l l and N eel, 1965], Sang h v i [1966] was the first to report on the quantitative data on consanguineous marriages in Tndia at the World Population Conference. Since then Sanghvi [1966] and many other Indian geneticists ; C h a k r a v a r ih i, 1968; C en ter w a ll et a i, 1969;D ronam R aju etaI., 1961;G osw a m i, 1970;M ukherjef.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diverse reasons have been projected as explanation for the lower rates of prenatal mortality which include a) genes responsible for foetal death are smaller in number, b) the developing foetus is well protected against genes that are capable of foetal impairment, c) lethal genes are less operating prentally in man etc. (Marcello et al,1964;Schull, 1959). On comparing the mortality levels of the present tribal groups with those reported in a few other inbreeding communities in the State (Pillai and Mathew, 1995;Sudhakaran and Vijayavalli, 1996) in association with the respective consanguinity rates it is apparent that there is a positive association between the two parameters, farley high rates occuring in communities with high inbreeding rates and vice versa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%