2016
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inbreeding load and purging: implications for the short-term survival and the conservation management of small populations

Abstract: Using computer simulations, we evaluate the effects of genetic purging of inbreeding load in small populations, assuming genetic models of deleterious mutations which account for the typical amount of load empirically observed. Our results show that genetic purging efficiently removes the inbreeding load of both lethal and non-lethal mutations, reducing the amount of inbreeding depression relative to that expected without selection. We find that the minimum effective population size to avoid severe inbreeding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
96
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(82 reference statements)
8
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, populations displaying high levels of individual inbreeding show a higher prevalence of monogenic disorders (e.g., Charlier et al., ) or complex diseases (e.g., Rudan et al., ). Inbreeding depression can thus increase the risk of extinction by reducing the population growth rate (Hedrick & Kalinowski, ; Keller & Waller, ) although it may be conversely favourable in some conditions by purging deleterious variants from the population (Caballero, Bravo, & Wang, ; Estoup et al., ). Assessing individual inbreeding is then of paramount interest to improve the management of populations under conservation or selection, and from a more general evolutionary perspective to better understand the genetic architecture of inbreeding depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, populations displaying high levels of individual inbreeding show a higher prevalence of monogenic disorders (e.g., Charlier et al., ) or complex diseases (e.g., Rudan et al., ). Inbreeding depression can thus increase the risk of extinction by reducing the population growth rate (Hedrick & Kalinowski, ; Keller & Waller, ) although it may be conversely favourable in some conditions by purging deleterious variants from the population (Caballero, Bravo, & Wang, ; Estoup et al., ). Assessing individual inbreeding is then of paramount interest to improve the management of populations under conservation or selection, and from a more general evolutionary perspective to better understand the genetic architecture of inbreeding depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current decline in population may therefore be due to human disturbance rather than to inbreeding or genetic drift. Management and conservation strategies should focus on maintaining the genetic diversity in situ, and on the cultivation of seedlings ex-situ for transplanting back to their original habitat.Forests 2020, 11, 469 2 of 15 reproduction and development [2,3]. In addition to human disturbance, genetic factors can also represent threats to wild species [4]; such processes as mating systems, genetic drift, gene flow, evolution, and life history greatly affect the genetic diversity and spatial structure of plant populations [5][6][7][8][9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) The results of our analysis suggest that the subpopulation(s) on the Cleveland Peninsula are phenotypically and genetically differentiated from the adjacent GMU situated in southeast Alaska. Metrics of diversity suggest the Cleveland Peninsula is isolated with limited gene flow and is thus at risk for inbreeding depression and increased extinction risk (Caballero et al 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%