Abstract:Context
In France, young children of incarcerated women live with their mothers in prison in specific units called nurseries, up to the age of 18 months. Only a few studies have examined the impact of this environment on these children. This study sought to explore through mothers' narratives how they perceive their children to experience this environment and how it affects their development.
Method
We used semistructured interviews to collect the perceptions of 25 mothers about their children's experience of … Show more
“…2 ). Three specific theories were most commonly referenced: attachment theory, 25 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 33 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 fundamental human rights and the best interest principle, 26 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 35 , 40 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 51 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 61 and gender responsive strategies. 25 , 46 , 55 , 57 , 59 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 21 publications referencing attachment theory, 20 suggested that M&Cs were beneficial to both incarcerated mothers and their children, while only one publication 30 presented the counter-argument that a prison environment is not suitable for healthy parent-child attachment or bonding. The reported benefits of M&Cs in terms of attachment theory can be grouped into 3 categories: M&Cs enable sustained contact between mothers and their offspring and enhance the mother–infant or mother–child bond 25 , 28 , 29 , 33 , 38 , 42 , 48 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 Children involved in M&Cs have improved early social, psychological, and emotional development and later life outcomes 25 , 28 , 29 , 33 , 38 , 43 , 46 , 49 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 M&Cs provide mothers with a motivation to be rehabilitated and to shift away from criminal behaviour 25 , 29 , 38 , 55 , 60 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children involved in M&Cs have improved early social, psychological, and emotional development and later life outcomes 25 , 28 , 29 , 33 , 38 , 43 , 46 , 49 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59…”
“…2 ). Three specific theories were most commonly referenced: attachment theory, 25 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 33 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 fundamental human rights and the best interest principle, 26 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 35 , 40 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 51 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 61 and gender responsive strategies. 25 , 46 , 55 , 57 , 59 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 21 publications referencing attachment theory, 20 suggested that M&Cs were beneficial to both incarcerated mothers and their children, while only one publication 30 presented the counter-argument that a prison environment is not suitable for healthy parent-child attachment or bonding. The reported benefits of M&Cs in terms of attachment theory can be grouped into 3 categories: M&Cs enable sustained contact between mothers and their offspring and enhance the mother–infant or mother–child bond 25 , 28 , 29 , 33 , 38 , 42 , 48 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 Children involved in M&Cs have improved early social, psychological, and emotional development and later life outcomes 25 , 28 , 29 , 33 , 38 , 43 , 46 , 49 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 M&Cs provide mothers with a motivation to be rehabilitated and to shift away from criminal behaviour 25 , 29 , 38 , 55 , 60 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children involved in M&Cs have improved early social, psychological, and emotional development and later life outcomes 25 , 28 , 29 , 33 , 38 , 43 , 46 , 49 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59…”
“…Second, considering adults' perspectives both during and after incarceration offers views on children's adjustment across time and space. Other studies that have examined parent perspectives on the impact of incarceration for children (e.g., Correa et al, 2021; Ogrizek et al, 2021) often focused on the prerelease period alone. This creates the potential of a false dichotomy between “before” and “after” incarceration periods.…”
Objective: This qualitative study examined adult perspectives on the adjustments children face through the process of paternal incarceration and eventual release. Background: While the United States leads the world in incarceration, 95% of imprisoned individuals return to community life. Despite poor outcomes for children with incarcerated fathers, less is known as to how they fair after fathers' release. Conceptualizing paternal incarceration and reentry as linked rather than disparate events, this study examines perspectives on family separation, reunification, and children's adjustment when fathers return from prison. Method: The sample consisted of 38 participants (19 previously incarcerated fathers, nine coparenting mothers, and 10 relatives) who shared perspectives on 63 children's adjustments. The semistructured interviews were analyzed via thematic analysis. Results: Two main themes were evident: (a) Paternal incarceration has a lasting toll on children that complicates reunification processes, introduces hurdles to maintaining togetherness, and is tied to changes in children's behaviors; and (b) reentry renews opportunity for father involvement that bolsters resilience despite ongoing systemic vulnerabilities. Conclusion: Postrelease family reunification may present challenges for children's adjustment, though supported transitions may curb some concerns. The findings call for strengths-oriented, needs-focused, and evidence-based reentry strategies that support entire family systems.
“…Although many studies have explored the physical impact of imprisonment while pregnant, fewer have focused on these mothers' psychological outcomes and experience (Ogrizek et al, 2021;Paynter et al, 2018). Based on these findings and the meager amount of research specifically focused on these mothers' experience of incarceration, we have chosen to explore how the carceral environment, might affect the natural transformation of their identity that women undergo, from their child's conception to its early months of life.…”
Background Many variables can influence the process of motherhood, including environmental precarity and personal adversity. One about which little is known is the impact of incarceration on women during or after pregnancy. In France, pregnant women or those with children up to 18 months old can be incarcerated with their child in specific units called nurseries. We sought to explore incarcerated women's experience of motherhood in prison environments and its potential consequences on the construction of their identity as mothers. Method We conducted semi-structured interviews to collect the experience of the process of motherhood among 25 mothers and 5 pregnant women in 13 different prison nurseries in France and used interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore the data. Results Four different themes emerged: prison conflates their status as inmates and as mothers; it limits their freedom as mothers; it disrupts their family structure; and motherhood may help distinguish them from other inmates. Conclusion Incarceration of pregnant women or young mothers in prison nurseries might disrupt the process involved in becoming mothers, causing their identities as prisoners to englobe their identities as mothers and resulting in inappropriate parenting support by prison staff. A professional specialized in peripartum issues should help each woman disentangle her identity as inmate and mother and enable her placement at the facility best adapted to her individual needs as a mother. In any case, if prison must continue to be possible, it must always be a last alternative for women with young children.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.