2014
DOI: 10.1080/14789949.2014.971853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incarcerated youths with high or low callous–unemotional traits: a comparison controlling for age of crime onset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results do not support the notion that the Callous-Unemotional dimension of the APSD-SR is especially relevant in identifying serious youth offenders and in predicting recidivism (Frick & White, 2008). Other studies have also put in to question the utility of the Callous-Unemotional traits after controlling for criminal history (e.g., Lahey, 2014; Pechorro, Nunes, Jiménez, & Hidalgo, 2015). This may also prove to be true from a clinical point of view because the new Limited Prosocial Emotions specifier of the Conduct Disorder diagnosis (APA, 2013) was partly derived from the items of the Callous-Unemotional dimension of the APSD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Results do not support the notion that the Callous-Unemotional dimension of the APSD-SR is especially relevant in identifying serious youth offenders and in predicting recidivism (Frick & White, 2008). Other studies have also put in to question the utility of the Callous-Unemotional traits after controlling for criminal history (e.g., Lahey, 2014; Pechorro, Nunes, Jiménez, & Hidalgo, 2015). This may also prove to be true from a clinical point of view because the new Limited Prosocial Emotions specifier of the Conduct Disorder diagnosis (APA, 2013) was partly derived from the items of the Callous-Unemotional dimension of the APSD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%