2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2008.00364.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentive Regulation and the Role of Convexity in Benchmarking Electricity Distribution: Economists Versus Engineers

Abstract: This note illustrates the potential impact of the specification of a convex production technology on establishing minimal costs compared to the use of a non-convex technology when benchmarking electricity distributors. This methodological reflection is mainly motivated by recent engineering literature providing evidence for non-convexities in electricity distribution. An empirical illustration using non-parametric specifications of technology illustrates this main point using a sample of Spanish electricity di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows that the multiplicative and the additive productivity measures are respectively the PM index and the PL productivity indicator. In such a case, our approach involves theoretical (Briec et al 2004; Chavas & Briec, 2012, 2018; Dasgupta & Mäler 2003; Tschirhart 2012) implications and suggests empirical investigations (De Borger, 1996; Grifell‐Tatjé & Kerstens, 2008). These works could be of particular interest in a future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It follows that the multiplicative and the additive productivity measures are respectively the PM index and the PL productivity indicator. In such a case, our approach involves theoretical (Briec et al 2004; Chavas & Briec, 2012, 2018; Dasgupta & Mäler 2003; Tschirhart 2012) implications and suggests empirical investigations (De Borger, 1996; Grifell‐Tatjé & Kerstens, 2008). These works could be of particular interest in a future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Indeed, relaxing convexity assumption implies major theoretical (Briec, Kerstens, & Vanden Eeckaut, 2004; Chavas & Briec, 2003, 2012; 2018; 2012) and empirical implications (De Borger, 1996; Grifell‐Tatjé & Kerstens, 2008). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the convexity property is not required to analyse environmental productivity variation. These results are of particular interest for theoretical (Dasgupta and Mäler, 2003;Tschirhart, 2012;Briec, 2012, 2018) and empirical (De Borger and Kerstens, 1996; Grifell-Tatjé and Kerstens, 2008) studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It is rather easy to find engineering applications that assess the efficiency of electricity generation (e.g., [29]) or electricity distribution (e.g., [30]) using convex production models. However, [31] argue and empirically illustrate that the specification of convex or nonconvex technologies impacts the measurement of the efficiency of electricity distributors. Thus, it is essential to clearly document the impact of convexity on modelling production relations.…”
Section: Economic and Environmental Decomposition Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%