2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentive spirometry with expiratory positive airway pressure reduces pulmonary complications, improves pulmonary function and 6-minute walk distance in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both techniques were carried out at the same time by the construction of a system that included one IS and one EPAP valve, as already described. 12 . To adequately adjust the pressure of the EPAP valve, a cmH 2 O-calibrated pressure manometer was used.…”
Section: Intervention Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both techniques were carried out at the same time by the construction of a system that included one IS and one EPAP valve, as already described. 12 . To adequately adjust the pressure of the EPAP valve, a cmH 2 O-calibrated pressure manometer was used.…”
Section: Intervention Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two commonly used resources of respiratory physiotherapy are the incentive spirometry (IS) and the expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP), which have the main physiological effect of promoting pulmonary reexpansion. Recently, it was demonstrated that the addition use of IS and EPAP in patients who went through CABG is capable of reducing the loss of pulmonary function, of respiratory muscle strength and of functional capacity 30 days after the surgery 12 . However, there are no studies available on the assessment of long-term effects of IS+EPAP yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33]35,37,40 Studies comparing incentive spirometry for PPC prevention after cardiac/thoracic surgery also include a trial with no intervention as the control, 48 and studies that compared incentive spirometry to other techniques. 44,45,47,48,51,52,54,55,58,60 The majority of these trials reported no difference between incentive spirometry and the comparator. 44,47,48,51,52,54,58,60 This creates one of the challenges in evaluating the evidence on incentive spirometry in PPC prevention.…”
Section: Incentive Spirometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main areas of investigation have been pursued: incentive spirometry for PPC prevention following upper abdominal surgery, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and incentive spirometry for PPC prevention following cardiac/thoracic surgery. [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] Comparison of these studies is difficult, owing to the various study designs (randomized controlled trials and prospective trials), the comparators (none, chest physical therapy [CPT], CPAP, expiratory airway pressure), the frequency of interventions (eg, hourly, every 4 hours), the duration of each intervention (number of maneuvers, minutes of therapy), and the outcomes (radiographic atelectasis, gas exchange, pneumonia, pulmonary function). Of the studies that used PPCs as an outcome, 3 compared incentive spirometry with a control group of no intervention following upper abdominal surgery.…”
Section: Incentive Spirometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the use of Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) promotes significant improvement of the gas exchange, reduction of dyspnea and of ventilatory work, providing increase of the training threshold through maintenance of the positive pressure in the airway in the expiratory phase [6][7][8] . To verify the EPAP use, the 6-minute walk test (6'WT) is well-tolerated by the patients for measurement of the functional capacity [8][9][10][11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%