2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2006.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentives for on-market buy-backs: Evidence from a transparent buy-back regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
91
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
91
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We find evidence that the differences in country characteristics are important in making buyback announcements. In particular, in the UK and Germany, dividends and share buybacks seem to be complements rather than substitutes (Mitchell and Dharmawan, 2007), whereas in France, share buybacks substitute dividends as shown by the negative coefficient of cash dividends consistent with and Skinner (2008). In addition, we find that the tax advantage of share repurchases over cash dividends has a significant influence on managers' decisions to make buyback announcements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find evidence that the differences in country characteristics are important in making buyback announcements. In particular, in the UK and Germany, dividends and share buybacks seem to be complements rather than substitutes (Mitchell and Dharmawan, 2007), whereas in France, share buybacks substitute dividends as shown by the negative coefficient of cash dividends consistent with and Skinner (2008). In addition, we find that the tax advantage of share repurchases over cash dividends has a significant influence on managers' decisions to make buyback announcements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…An additional limitation in Jain et al (2009) is that buybacks and dividends are treated as perfect substitutes despite the controversial empirical evidence on the matter (e.g., De Angelo et al, 2000;Jagannathan et al, 2000;Dittmar, 2000;Mitchell and Dharmawan, 2007;Denis and Osobov, 2008). Similarly, Chay and Suh (2009) find that mature firms with low cash flow uncertainty are more likely to pay dividends supporting the life-cycle theory of dividends (De Angelo et al, 2006;Denis and Osobov, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this argument, are the findings of Mitchell and Dharmawan (2007) who find that firms which are small and announce their intention to repurchase a large fraction of their outstanding capital, have a significant signalling impact. In addition, Dittmar (2000), Grullon and Michaely (2002), and Ikenberry et al (1995) report evidence that size has a positive relationship with the volume of share repurchases.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the discussion that follows we briefly outline those variables and the rationale for their inclusion in the present study. The correlation coefficients are provided in repurchases can be considerably more flexible as a payout method compared to dividends, and existing evidence suggests that firms are more likely to repurchase their stock when they have high cash flows and low investment opportunities (Dittmar 2000;Mitchell and Dharmawan 2007). As in Dittmar (2000), to proxy for excess cash we use the ratio of net operating income before taxes and depreciation to total assets at the year-end prior to the repurchase announcement (Cash Flow).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation