2013
DOI: 10.2495/sc131032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentives mechanism for the conservation of traditional villages in Japan and South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the protective attitude of the residents was not affected by cultural values but by their perception of the economic benefits and daily utility value. Radzuan et al [21] studied incentive mechanisms, including loans, tax breaks, and public subsidies, developed in Japan and South Korea to promote cultural heritage conservation. They identified how the incentives work, their limitations, and their constraints.…”
Section: Research On Cultural Heritage Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the protective attitude of the residents was not affected by cultural values but by their perception of the economic benefits and daily utility value. Radzuan et al [21] studied incentive mechanisms, including loans, tax breaks, and public subsidies, developed in Japan and South Korea to promote cultural heritage conservation. They identified how the incentives work, their limitations, and their constraints.…”
Section: Research On Cultural Heritage Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al believed that in the protection of traditional rural landscape with cultural elements, the protection attitude of local residents was mainly affected by economic benefits and daily utility values, rather than cultural values, and it was necessary to provide appropriate incentives for the development of a protection attitude among local residents so as to realize the sustainability of cultural heritage [34]. Mat Radzuan et al, after investigating various incentive mechanisms including public subsidies, loans, tax relief, and so on developed by Japanese and Korean authorities to promote the protection of cultural heritage, studied the operation mechanism of incentive plans and the limitations of incentive policies in meeting the needs of communities and discovered the constraints of the implementation of these incentive policies [35]. In Ainokura and Kawagoe, using the methods of questionnaire and interview, Mat Radzuan et al examined the residents' views on the implementation of cultural heritage protection and reward schemes in traditional residential areas and proposed that incentive programs created for the community should be suitable for the fulfilment of their aspirations and real needs [36].…”
Section: Passing On Ich and Incentive Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%