Incentives to change: effects of performance-based financing on health workers in Zambia

Abstract

BackgroundPerformance-based financing (PBF) has been implemented in a number of countries with the aim of transforming health systems and improving maternal and child health. This paper examines the effect of PBF on health workers’ job satisfaction, motivation, and attrition in Zambia. It uses a randomized intervention/control design to evaluate before–after changes for three groups: intervention (PBF) group, control 1 (C1; enhanced financing) group, and control 2 (C2; pure control) group.MethodsMixed methods are employed. The quantitative portion comprises of a baseline and an endline survey. The survey and sampling scheme were designed to allow for a rigorous impact evaluation of PBF or C1 on several key performance indicators. The qualitative portion seeks to explain the pathways underlying the observed differences through interviews conducted at the beginning and at the three-year mark of the PBF program.ResultsEconometric analysis shows that PBF led to increased job satisfaction and decreased attrition on a subset of measures, with little effect on motivation. The C1 group also experienced some positive effects on job satisfaction. The null results of the quantitative assessment of motivation cohere with those of the qualitative assessment, which revealed that workers remain motivated by their dedication to the profession and to provide health care to the community rather than by financial incentives. The qualitative evidence also provides two explanations for higher overall job satisfaction in the C1 than in the PBF group: better working conditions and more effective supervision from the District Medical Office. The PBF group had higher satisfaction with compensation than both control groups because they have higher compensation and financial autonomy, which was intended to be part of the PBF intervention. While PBF could not address all the reasons for attrition, it did lower turnover because those health centers were staffed with qualified personnel and the personnel had role clarity.ConclusionsIn Zambia, the implementation of PBF schemes brought about a significant increase in job satisfaction and a decrease in attrition, but had no significant effect on motivation. Enhanced health financing also increased stated job satisfaction.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12960-017-0179-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effects in spite of tough constraints - A theory of change based investigation of contextual and implementation factors affecting the results of a performance based financing scheme extended to malnutrition in Burundi

“…The effects of PBF-N have been partly determined by problems at the level of these other interventions. This dependence upon the whole health system has been documented in many PBF studies; barriers vary across experiences, but several of those reported in this study (competencies of human resources at the facility level, skills of supervisors, supply of inputs and delays in payment) have been reported in other experiences [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. Such a dependence confirms the systemic nature of PBF [61], but at short term, it has an impact on the effectiveness of the strategy.…”

What characteristics of provider payment mechanisms influence health care providers' behaviour? A literature review

“…Furthermore, monitoring serves as an audit function to guard against gaming and overpayment . Importantly, performance‐adjusted payment rates have been shown to motivate health care providers to align their health care services (outcomes) with the performance requirements, especially quality …”

Mainstreaming Mental Health Care in 42 Countries

“…Existing empirical evidence has demonstrated that efforts to build the management capacity in health facilities and of health teams can improve the performance of LMICs' health systems. [43][44][45][46] This leads to the first research question: What managerial know-how has helped augment the implementation of deinstitutionalization interventions?…”