1984
DOI: 10.3109/03009748409102662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and ClinicaI Significance of Anti-ENA Antibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus:Estimation by Counterimmunoelectrophoresis

Abstract: Eighty-two patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were investigated for the presence and significance of serum antibodies to Extractable Nuclear Antigen (ENA) and its major components, RNP, Sm and SS-B (or Ha). The counterimmunoelectrophoresis assay allowed independent detection and measurement of antibodies to the different components. Forty patients had anti-ENA antibodies, 25 (30%) were of anti-RNP type alone or anti-RNP associated with anti-Sm, and 12 (15%) were of anti-RNP type alone. Anti-ENA a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of other research regarding associated features of myositis overlap, our findings of the tendency of myositis overlap patients to have anti-RNP positive, renal sparing SLE is consistent with the current literature [18]. Additionally, the rate of anti-Sm antibodies in our cohort was 69%, which is quite high compared to the reported prevalence of 30% in North America [24]. This could be secondary to the fact that our population is largely African-American, and the literature demonstrates that anti-Sm antibodies are known to be more prevalent in African-Americans [24-26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of other research regarding associated features of myositis overlap, our findings of the tendency of myositis overlap patients to have anti-RNP positive, renal sparing SLE is consistent with the current literature [18]. Additionally, the rate of anti-Sm antibodies in our cohort was 69%, which is quite high compared to the reported prevalence of 30% in North America [24]. This could be secondary to the fact that our population is largely African-American, and the literature demonstrates that anti-Sm antibodies are known to be more prevalent in African-Americans [24-26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, the rate of anti-Sm antibodies in our cohort was 69%, which is quite high compared to the reported prevalence of 30% in North America [24]. This could be secondary to the fact that our population is largely African-American, and the literature demonstrates that anti-Sm antibodies are known to be more prevalent in African-Americans [24-26]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Approximately 25% of SLE patients produce antibodies against the Sm proteins of the spliceosome, particularly autoantibodies to the B/B' proteins [10], [11]. The related anti-nRNP antibodies, directed against nRNP 70 K, nRNP A, and nRNP C, are more prevalent but less specific for SLE [12]. Antibodies against the Ro autoantigen are present in approximately 50% sera from SLE patients [13], though even less specific, and generally bind a 60 kD Ro protein with many also binding a 52 kD Ro moiety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1966, Sm was identified as a unique autoantigen, the first non-histone target of autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients [47]. Named for 15-year-old Stephanie Smith, antibodies to Sm became one of the diagnostic criteria for SLE [48], detectable in 5-30% of SLE patients [48,49]. Later studies correlated anti-Sm titers with kidney disease [50][51][52][53].…”
Section: A Short History Of Smmentioning
confidence: 99%