2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-018-3718-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and clinical significance of postoperative delirium after brain tumor surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
43
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14] Potential associations between POD and adverse outcomes have also been reported in neurosurgical patients. [8][9][10][11] These results indicate that early prevention of POD should be employed in this population. Perioperative preventive medications have been an active area of clinical POD researches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[12][13][14] Potential associations between POD and adverse outcomes have also been reported in neurosurgical patients. [8][9][10][11] These results indicate that early prevention of POD should be employed in this population. Perioperative preventive medications have been an active area of clinical POD researches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In four observational studies, including 2769 patients after intracranial operation, POD occurred in 349 patients with an overall pooled crude incidence of 13%. [8][9][10][11] A recent meta-analysis of non-cardiac patients showed that the incidence of POD reduced by approximately half when dexmedetomidine was used perioperatively. 14 We assume that the incidence of POD would be reduced by one-third in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the placebo group in the present study.…”
Section: Current Sample Size Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main concern about the use of the CAM-ICU in neurocritically ill patients is whether this instrument is assessable. To date, three cohort studies have used the CAM-ICU for postoperative delirium diagnosis in patients after brain tumor resection [11][12][13], two of which did not report the rate of "not assessable" evaluations [11,12]. In our previous study enrolling 815 patients after intracranial operations, CAM-ICU evaluation was attempted twice daily on postoperative day one and three, of which 27 (3.3%) and 20 (2.5%) were marked as "not assessable" [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In four published cohort studies including a total of 2649 patients after brain tumor resection, postoperative delirium was diagnosed in 317 (12.0%, 95% con dence interval: 10.8-13.3%) with an incidence ranging from 4.2-18.4% [10][11][12][13]. These studies also found that postoperative delirium was likely associated with a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital [10,12,13], a higher incidence of nondelirium postoperative complications [13], a greater risk of an unfavorable functional outcome [10,11], and higher hospital costs [12,13]. Based on the prevalence and the potential association with adverse consequences for postoperative delirium in patients after intracranial operations for brain tumors, intervention studies are warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%