2005
DOI: 10.1515/jpm.2005.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and diagnosis of unilateral arterial cerebral infarction in newborn infants

Abstract: Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is accepted as the gold standard for the diagnosis of arterial cerebral infarction (ACI), but few studies have reported the incidence of neonatal ACI based on MRI findings. We provide new population-based epidemiologic and diagnostic data on all infants diagnosed between 1997 and 2002 in our center with an MRI-confirmed diagnosis of unilateral neonatal ACI. Results: Nine patients were identified, giving an incidence of 1:2300 unilateral ACIs in our inborn population. In a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
40
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported incidence of NAIS differs widely between studies, possibly because of differences in inclusion criteria, reporting strategies, study duration, frequency of diagnostic procedures in at-risk children, study populations (eg, including or excluding preterm neonates), and health care policies (see Table 1). Epidemiologic data have been provided by 4 hospital-based studies 13,[16][17][18] Hospital-based studies report a higher incidence of NAIS than do population-based studies. 13,[16][17][18] Three of the population-based studies included NAIS (presentation during the neonatal period) and PPIS (diagnosed retrospectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reported incidence of NAIS differs widely between studies, possibly because of differences in inclusion criteria, reporting strategies, study duration, frequency of diagnostic procedures in at-risk children, study populations (eg, including or excluding preterm neonates), and health care policies (see Table 1). Epidemiologic data have been provided by 4 hospital-based studies 13,[16][17][18] Hospital-based studies report a higher incidence of NAIS than do population-based studies. 13,[16][17][18] Three of the population-based studies included NAIS (presentation during the neonatal period) and PPIS (diagnosed retrospectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiologic data have been provided by 4 hospital-based studies 13,[16][17][18] Hospital-based studies report a higher incidence of NAIS than do population-based studies. 13,[16][17][18] Three of the population-based studies included NAIS (presentation during the neonatal period) and PPIS (diagnosed retrospectively). 2,12,14 Two population-based studies included only NAIS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 The incidence of perinatal stroke has been estimated at 1 every 1600-4000 live newborn infants; 80% are of ischemic nature and, even though it is difficult to know the actual incidence of ischemic cases, it is probably higher than 1 every 1500 live newborn infants, making the perinatal period one of the moments in life with the highest risk for stroke. 1,[4][5][6] Such high incidence of perinatal stroke is because both the mother and the fetus have transient risk factors, which are typical of late stages of pregnancy, childbirth and the first postnatal weeks, when the newborn infant is prone to a prothrombotic state ( Table 1). Due to this transient predisposition, the risk of recurrence is very low, between 2% and 3%.…”
Section: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis Of Perinatal Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] La principal manifestación clínica de esta entidad son las convulsiones; sin embargo, muchos recién nacidos que sufrieron un ACV prenatal o neonatal no manifestarán signos sugerentes y, en consecuencia, el ACV se diagnosticará tiempo después, debido a sus secuelas y no a la sintomatología aguda. Para esta situación en la cual el diagnóstico de ACV perinatal se difiere meses o años y se realiza fuera del período neonatal, se ha adoptado la expresión accidente cerebrovascular isquémico presuntamente perinatal (Presumed Perinatal Ischemic Stroke; PPIS, por sus siglas en inglés).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified