2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and distribution of ocular disorders in the first year of life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This nding is consistent with previous studies that have reported a similar sex distribution among screened infants. 12 The mean age of the participants was 3.35 ± 2.95 months, with the majority falling into the 1-3 month age group (52.5%). This result suggests that the screening program was successful in reaching infants at an early stage, allowing for early detection and intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This nding is consistent with previous studies that have reported a similar sex distribution among screened infants. 12 The mean age of the participants was 3.35 ± 2.95 months, with the majority falling into the 1-3 month age group (52.5%). This result suggests that the screening program was successful in reaching infants at an early stage, allowing for early detection and intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This nding is consistent with previous studies that have reported similar rates of normal ndings in screened infants. 9,12,13 However, a signi cant number of infants (41.4%) were diagnosed with various eye diseases. The leading causes of eye diseases among the screened infants were bacterial conjunctivitis (24.6%), congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (5.7%), epiblepharon (3.3%), and neonatal conjunctivitis (1.2%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation