2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and dosimetric parameters for brainstem necrosis following intensity modulated radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radiation technique has been reported previously. 3 The normal tissue constraints basically followed the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocols 0225 and 0615 11,12 and QUANTEC. For the brain stem, ideally we recommended a maximum dose of 54 Gy; if not fullfilled, the acceptable alternate was to allow <60 Gy to 1% of the volume of the brain stem.…”
Section: Treatment and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The radiation technique has been reported previously. 3 The normal tissue constraints basically followed the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocols 0225 and 0615 11,12 and QUANTEC. For the brain stem, ideally we recommended a maximum dose of 54 Gy; if not fullfilled, the acceptable alternate was to allow <60 Gy to 1% of the volume of the brain stem.…”
Section: Treatment and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In one study of 1544 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing IMRT, only 2 developed BSI and, notably, in both patients the BSI showed remission on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 3 Thus, it appears that in the IMRT era, BSI might not be as serious a problem as before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the findings from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial (0225), the recommended maximal dose for IMRT should not exceed 54 Gy or 60 Gy for locally advanced NPC [21]. These thresholds were established based on dosimetry data from conventional two-dimensional and three-dimensional radiotherapy [9,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is questionable whether such dose constraints are most effective in clinical practice, in terms of patient clinical outcome. Also, sometimes it is difficult for clinicians to achieve a satisfactory outcome under the restriction of an IMRT dose for stage T3–T4 NPC [7,10,2226]. Currently, there are few reports regarding the study of brainstem radiation toxicity in patients treated for NPC [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%