2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and effects of genetic factors on canine impaction in an isolated Jewish population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study demonstrated that almost half of the patients with impacted maxillary canines have other associated dental anomalies. This finding is in agreement with other studies, where a high percentage of patients with impacted canines have other associated anomalies . It also highlights the fact that palatally‐ and buccally‐impacted canines can occur in dentitions without other dental deviations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present study demonstrated that almost half of the patients with impacted maxillary canines have other associated dental anomalies. This finding is in agreement with other studies, where a high percentage of patients with impacted canines have other associated anomalies . It also highlights the fact that palatally‐ and buccally‐impacted canines can occur in dentitions without other dental deviations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results regarding the gender distribution, type of occurrence, and localization of impacted canines resemble those found in the literature,6,15,19,20,21 although some studies showed a tendency towards buccal impactions 7,15. The association between gender and the location of impacted canines was not significant, although women presented palatally impacted canines more often.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Lack of space in the dental arch, trauma, and loss of primary teeth as well as a genetic component are pointed out as etiological factors [8, 9]. The facial impaction of a maxillary permanent canine is usually more frequent in crowded dental arches, while palatal impaction usually shows no association with any particular malocclusion [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%