Incidence and etiology of mandibular fractures treated in Vilnius University Hospital Žalgiris clinic, Lithuania: a review of 1 508 cases

Zaleckas, Linas; Drobnys, Povilas; Rimkuvienė, Jūratė

doi:10.6001/actamedica.v20i1.2627

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Excessive consumption of alcohol is strongly associated with maxillofacial trauma. In the present study, alcohol consumption before the injury was recorded in 17.4% of cases which is in stark contrast to what Sirimaharaj and Pyung Tanas Up reported in their study (Zaleckas et al, 2013;Marimuthu, 2018;Patil, 2017). The mandible is more prone to injury than the zygomatic complex due to its mobility and lesser bony support compared with the maxilla (Subhashraj et al, 2007;Akama, 2008).…”

Section: Figure 2: This Bar Chart Represents the Association Between contrasting

confidence: 85%

Risk Factors of Maxillofacial Trauma

P¹,

Wahab²,

Jagadish³

2020

ijrps

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maxillofacial trauma is any physical damage to the facial area that maxillofacial surgeons typically experience and is often associated with high morbidity. Maxillofacial injuries in other areas of the body may occur as a single injury or may be associated with multiple injuries. The aim of this study is to assess the etiology of maxillofacial trauma at hospital in Chennai, South India, over a period of 1 year. Maxillofacial injury cases have been reported using the Department database and clinical reports. A total of 74 patients details were taken by reviewing patient records. The mean age of the patients was 30 ± 12 years. Road traffic accidents were the most common form of etiology for trauma. The etiology maxillofacial injuries reflect the trauma patterns within the community and can thus provide a guide to help design programs toward prevention and treatment.

show abstract

Section: Figure 2: This Bar Chart Represents the Association Between contrasting

confidence: 85%

Risk Factors of Maxillofacial Trauma

P¹,

Wahab²,

Jagadish³

2020

ijrps

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Single fracture divided into two fragments, whereas multiple fractures are mandibular fractures that occur in several places and divided into multiple fragments. 1 The primary goal of mandibular fracture treatment is to restore mandibular anatomy, and function. 1 ORIF mandibular fracture is a surgical intervention to open and conduct a direct exploration of the mandibular fracture area through a surgical incision of the skin or mucosa in order to obtain a direct view of the fractured bone fragment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 The primary goal of mandibular fracture treatment is to restore mandibular anatomy, and function. 1 ORIF mandibular fracture is a surgical intervention to open and conduct a direct exploration of the mandibular fracture area through a surgical incision of the skin or mucosa in order to obtain a direct view of the fractured bone fragment. 4 Quality of life is related to normality, including the ability to function normally and to meet daily needs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This fracture can cause functional impairment and pain in the mandibular bone, thereby reducing the overall quality of life. 1 Symptoms of mandibular fracture were pain, swelling, tenderness, and malocclusion, as shown by radiographic examination. According to the research done by Rashid in London between June 2005 and May 2010, the incidence of mandibular fracture was higher in men (87%) than in women (13%) (male: female ratio 6.6: 1).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quality of life patients after treatment of mandibular fractures with ORIF in oral surgery departement of Dr. Sardjito general hospital

Apriza

Rahardjo

Hasan

2020

Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Management of mandibular fracture using open reduction Internal fixation (ORIF) method is one of the ideal treatments for single and multiple mandibular fractures. The aim of this study was to determine the quality of life of patients after the treatment of mandibular fractures with ORIF using miniplate in single and multiple mandibular fractures. This research used case-control by recalling 43 research subjects in the oral surgery department Dr Sardjito general hospital between 2013 and 2017, that consisted of patients suffering from 23 single fractures and 20 multiple mandibular fractures. Each fracture would be examined clinically and subjectively. Clinical examination parameters were conducted using the mandibular mobility index (MMI) consisting of mouth opening assessment, left and right lateral mandibular excursion, and mandibular protrusive movement. Subjective parameters were performed based on general oral health asseesment index (GOHAI) questionnaire to assess physiological aspects, psychosocial aspects, and pain. The results of the chi-square test statistic study showed that the quality of life of a patient with a single mandibular fracture was better than that of multiple mandibular fractures based on MMI and GOHAI examinations. It was concluded that patients with a single mandibular fracture had a younger age, longer time adaptation and have a better quality of life.

show abstract

“…4,5 Road traffic accidents are reported to be the primary causes of mandibular fractures in USA and Pakistan. 6,7 Management of mandibular fractures solely done by Inter-maxillary fixation, or by osteo-synthesis or by combination of both procedures. 8 Intermaxillary fixation is usually done for fracture reduction to reestablish proper occlusion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mandibular Fracture Management;

Kumar

Shah

Panjabi³

et al. 2019

TPMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT… Objectives: To compare the efficacy of Maxillomandibular fixation screws versus Erich Arch bar in the management of mandibular fractures. Study Design: Comparative case series study. Setting: . Period: 29/03/2016 to 28/09/2016. Methodology: Forty patients of either gender with age above 18 years with mandibular fracture requiring closed reduction were included. 20 patients of Groups A, treated with Maxillomandibular fixation screws and 20 patients of Group B treated with Erich Arch bar. Mean operative time was noted. All patients were followed up on every week up to four weeks. The statistical analysis via t-test was used and P-value <0.05 was categorized as significant. Results: In MMF screw group 13(65.0%) patients were male and 7(35.0%) patients were female whereas in Arch Bar group, 15(75.0%) were male and 5(25.0%) were female. Evidence of wire stick injury was found positive in 2(10.0%) and 4(20.0%) patients among MMF screw and Arch Bar groups respectively. In MMF screw group, mean operative time was 84.20±18.04 minutes whereas in Arch Bar groups it was 121.80±13.68 minutes. The mean operative time is significantly reduced in MMF screw group as compared to Arch Bar group with p value <0.01. Conclusion: We conclude that Maxillomandibular fixation with screws was more worthwhile mode as matched to the conservative Erich arch bars for managing the mandibular fractures.

show abstract

Incidence and etiology of mandibular fractures treated in Vilnius University Hospital Žalgiris clinic, Lithuania: a review of 1 508 cases

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

Risk Factors of Maxillofacial Trauma

Risk Factors of Maxillofacial Trauma

Quality of life patients after treatment of mandibular fractures with ORIF in oral surgery departement of Dr. Sardjito general hospital

Mandibular Fracture Management;

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About