2013
DOI: 10.4244/eijv9i1a10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and predictors of stent thrombosis: a single-centre study of 5,833 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery stenting

Abstract: The incidence of definite/probable ST in this "real-world" registry is 1.9%. Cardiogenic shock, often excluded in clinical trials, is the strongest independent predictor of ST.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
43
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the implantation of ≥ 2 stents may be needed for the treatment of multiple lesions within IRA. Importantly, in line with previous reports, implantation of ≥ 2 stents was associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis [6,8]. A higher number of implanted stents/longer total stent length itself poses a risk of thrombotic complications after stent implantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the implantation of ≥ 2 stents may be needed for the treatment of multiple lesions within IRA. Importantly, in line with previous reports, implantation of ≥ 2 stents was associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis [6,8]. A higher number of implanted stents/longer total stent length itself poses a risk of thrombotic complications after stent implantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In our study, multiple stent implantation was required in older patients with multi-vessel disease, as well as haemodynamically unstable patients. Importantly, haemodynamic instability (cardiogenic shock) itself is associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis [6,8]. However, the difference in the risk for stent thrombosis between patients treated with 1 stent vs. ≥ 2 stents persisted even after correction for potential confounding factors and risk profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations