2022
DOI: 10.1002/mus.27504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and prevalence of immune‐mediated necrotizing myopathy in adults in Olmsted County, Minnesota

Abstract: Introduction/Aims: Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is considered a rare subtype of the immune-mediated myopathies, but its incidence and prevalence are unknown. In this study we aimed to determine the incidence and prevalence of IMNM among adults in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Methods:We identified adult patients with IMNM, as defined by the 2016 European Neuromuscular Centre diagnostic criteria, among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota over a 20-year period.Results: Seven patients fulfilled the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we assume that an infection with SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t decrease or increase the probability of developing a disease or health problem X, than we can expect the incidence (occurrence of new cases per year) of that disease or health problem X to be the same in the population of SARS-CoV-2 infected people than in the population from which the incidence was previously derived from (usually this data stem from pre-COVID times). This means that among the roughly 265 million infected people per year – for the sake of this thought experiment we neglect the fact that people can be reinfected - statistically speaking 2552 people would develop dermatomyositis (DM) in the same year that they were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (assuming an incidence of DM of 9.63/Million [40]), 2200 would develop an immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMMN, assuming an incidence of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy of 8.3 Million person-years [41]), 250 thousand people would suffer from an ischemic stroke (assuming an incidence of 9451 per million [42]) and some people would be overrun by a car or struck by a lightning in the same year they tested positive for the virus. Considering that part of these diseases will be diagnosed before and part of them will be diagnosed after the infection, still a substantial number of new cases of even rarer diseases each year will be first diagnosed after an infection with SARS-CoV-2 [43].…”
Section: The Epistemological Problem With Case Studies In the Context...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we assume that an infection with SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t decrease or increase the probability of developing a disease or health problem X, than we can expect the incidence (occurrence of new cases per year) of that disease or health problem X to be the same in the population of SARS-CoV-2 infected people than in the population from which the incidence was previously derived from (usually this data stem from pre-COVID times). This means that among the roughly 265 million infected people per year – for the sake of this thought experiment we neglect the fact that people can be reinfected - statistically speaking 2552 people would develop dermatomyositis (DM) in the same year that they were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (assuming an incidence of DM of 9.63/Million [40]), 2200 would develop an immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMMN, assuming an incidence of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy of 8.3 Million person-years [41]), 250 thousand people would suffer from an ischemic stroke (assuming an incidence of 9451 per million [42]) and some people would be overrun by a car or struck by a lightning in the same year they tested positive for the virus. Considering that part of these diseases will be diagnosed before and part of them will be diagnosed after the infection, still a substantial number of new cases of even rarer diseases each year will be first diagnosed after an infection with SARS-CoV-2 [43].…”
Section: The Epistemological Problem With Case Studies In the Context...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of malignancy in IMNM was not higher than that of the general population. In conclusion, IMNM is a rare disease with a prevalence of one-tenth of that of IBM in Olmsted County, Minnesota (75).…”
Section: Muscular Imagingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Statin-induced rhabdomyolysis and IMNM are rare entities. Table 1 shows the characteristics of statin-induced myopathies [ 3 , 6 , 8 - 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%