Incidence and prevalence of peri‐implantitis and peri‐implant mucositis 17 to 23 (18.9) years postimplant placement

Krebs, Mischa; Kesar, Nikolina; Begić, Amira; Krockow, Nadine von; Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus; Weigl, Paul

doi:10.1111/cid.12848

Cited by 34 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The role of the clinical parameters on bone loss prediction is controversial as revealed by previous studies. The clinician should be cognisant of possible false-positive findings (Coli et al, 2017;Doornewaard et al, 2018;Hashim et al, 2018;Krebs et al, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fixed full‐arch maxillary prostheses supported by four versus six implants with a titanium CAD/CAM milled framework: 3‐year multicentre RCT

Toia

Stocchero

Corrà³

et al. 2020

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThis RCT compares marginal bone level (MBL) change and the clinical parameters after a 3‐year function in maxillary implant‐supported fixed complete dentures (FCDs) treated with four‐implants (4‐I) or six‐implants (6‐I).Material and methodThree centres treated 56 patients with 280 implants allocated to the 4‐I or 6‐I group. Radiographic and clinical examinations were performed. The primary outcome was to investigate MBL change between the groups.ResultsImplant survival rates were 100% and 99% in the 4‐I and 6‐I groups, respectively. Considering the clustering effects, the MBL change was not significantly different between the groups over the 3‐year follow‐up. The MBL in the 4‐I group was 0.30 ± 0.50 mm at baseline, 0.24 ± 0.31 mm at 1 year and 0.24 ± 0.38 mm at 3 years. In the 6‐I group, MBL was 0.14 ± 0.32 mm at baseline, 0.16 ± 0.35 mm at 1 year and 0.12 ± 0.26 mm at 3 years. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups at BL and 3Y. No significant differences between the groups were reported for clinical parameters at each time point as well as in between the visits. The technical and biological complications rates were 1.6% and 6.0%, respectively. Prosthetic complications affected 25 FCDs (47.2%).ConclusionMarginal bone level change revealed a stable condition in the 3‐year period in the two groups. Few technical and biological complications occurred apart from the chipping/fracture of the prosthetic teeth. Four‐implant is a feasible solution if the rehabilitation is oriented towards the most cost‐effective treatment and towards avoiding bone augmentation procedures. Clinicians have to consider the potential required visits for prosthetic maintenance.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fixed full‐arch maxillary prostheses supported by four versus six implants with a titanium CAD/CAM milled framework: 3‐year multicentre RCT

Toia

Stocchero

Corrà³

et al. 2020

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Peri-implant diseases are infective complications of surrounding dental implant tissues that often occurs [49], demonstrated a peri-implantitis incidence of 7.9% on implant level. Pjetursson et al [50] studied the 5-and 10-year survival of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) analyzing 32 studies that matched the criteria for the systematic review.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They represent a high risk of implant failure. A recent study, with a long follow-up [ 49 ], demonstrated a peri-implantitis incidence of 7.9% on implant level.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic bone level around particular laser-treated dental implants: 1 to 6 years multicenter retrospective study

Mongardini

Zeza

Pelagalli³

et al. 2020

Int J Implant Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes, in terms of implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and peri-implantitis incidence, of a titanium implants with an innovative laser-treated surface. Materials and methods: A total of 502 dental implants were inserted in four dental practices (Udine, Arezzo, Frascati, Roma) between 2008 and 2013. All inserted implants had laser-modified surface characterized by a series of 20-μmdiameter holes (7-10 μm deep) every 10 μm (Synthegra®, Geass srl, Italy). The minimum follow-up period was set at 1 year after the final restoration. Radiographs were taken after implant insertion (T0), at time of loading (T1), and during the follow-up period (last recall, T2). Marginal bone loss and peri-implant disease incidence were recorded. Results: A total of 502 implants with a maximum follow-up period of 6 years were monitored. The mean differential between T0 and T2 was 0.05 ± 1.08 mm at the mesial aspect and 0.08 ± 1.11 mm at the distal with a mean follow-up period of 35.76 ± 18.05 months. After being in function for 1 to 6 years, implants reported varying behavior: 8.8% of sites did not show any radiographic changes and 38.5% of sites showed bone resorption. The bone appeared to have been growing coronally in 50.7% of the sites measured. Conclusion: Implants showed a maintenance of marginal bone levels over time, and in many cases, it seems that laser-modified implant surface could promote a bone growth. The low peri-implant disease incidence recorded could be attributed to the laser titanium surface features that seem to prevent bacterial colonization. Future randomized and controlled studies are needed to confirm the results of the present multi-centrical retrospective analysis.

show abstract

“…Concerning risk factors, they identified medium and medium-high evidence with respect to development of the illness in patients who are smokers, those without regular maintenance control, and those with diabetes mellitus (DM) or with a history of periodontitis [6]. In their retrospective clinical study by Krebs, it was found that the incidence of PI is 7.9% at the implant level and 13.2% at the patient level seventeen years after implant placement [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Oxidative Stress on Dental Implants

Esquivel-Chirino

Gómez-Landeros

Carabantes-Campos

et al. 2021

EJDENT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periodontal disease is an inflammatory condition that alters the periodontium, resulting in destruction of the alveolar bone; without treatment the condition may lead to tooth loss. Dental implants are an alternative for substitution of naturally lost teeth as they have high success rates; however, some factors are related to its failure. Peri-implantitis (PI) is a pathological condition that affects the tissues surrounding dental implants and has been reported as the major cause of implant failure; PI and periodontal diseases are characterized by tissue inflammation and bone damage. In homeostasis conditions, reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to be involved in cell maintenance, signal transduction, and repair of all tissues, but ROS overaccumulation leads to oxidative stress, which generates cell damage and tissue destruction; likewise, antioxidants protect against the destructive effects of ROS by turning free radicals into waste products. The main purpose of this review was to determine some aspects of inflammatory responses and oxidative stress and analyze their relationship with the lack of osseointegration and PI.

show abstract

Incidence and prevalence of peri‐implantitis and peri‐implant mucositis 17 to 23 (18.9) years postimplant placement

Cited by 34 publications

References 32 publications

Fixed full‐arch maxillary prostheses supported by four versus six implants with a titanium CAD/CAM milled framework: 3‐year multicentre RCT

Fixed full‐arch maxillary prostheses supported by four versus six implants with a titanium CAD/CAM milled framework: 3‐year multicentre RCT

Radiographic bone level around particular laser-treated dental implants: 1 to 6 years multicenter retrospective study

The Impact of Oxidative Stress on Dental Implants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About