Incidence and risk factors for food hypersensitivity in UK infants: results from a birth cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundThe prevalence of food hypersensitivity in the UK is still largely open to debate. Additionally its pathogenesis is also unclear although it is known that there are differing phenotypes. Determining its prevalence, along with identifying those factors associated with its development will help to assess its clinical importance within the national setting and also add to the debate on appropriate prevention strategies.MethodsA population based birth cohort study conducted in Hampshire, UK as part of the EuroPrevall birth cohort study. 1140 infants were recruited with 823 being followed up until 2 years of age. Infants with suspected food reactions were assessed including specific IgE measurement and skin prick testing. Diagnosis of food hypersensitivity was by positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) where symptoms up to 48 h after the end of the food challenge were considered indicative of a food hypersensitivity. Factors associated with food hypersensitivity and its two phenotypes of IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated disease were modelled in a multivariable logistic regression analysis.ResultsCumulative incidence of food hypersensitivity by 2 years of age was 5.0 %. The cumulative incidence for individual food allergens were hens’ egg 2.7 % (1.6–3.8); cows’ milk 2.4 % (1.4–3.5); peanut 0.7 % (0.1–1.3); soy 0.4 % (0.0–0.8); wheat 0.2 % (0.0–0.5) and 0.1 % (0.0–0.32) for fish. The cumulative incidence of IgE-mediated food allergy was 2.6 % with 2.1 % reacting to hens’ egg. For non-IgE-mediated food allergy the cumulative incidence was 2.4 % (cows’ milk 1.7 %). Predictors for any food hypersensitivity were wheeze, maternal atopy, increasing gestational age, age at first solid food introduction and mean healthy dietary pattern score. Predictors for IgE mediated allergy were eczema, rhinitis and healthy dietary pattern score whereas for non-IgE-mediated food allergy the predictors were dog in the home, healthy dietary pattern score, maternal consumption of probiotics during breastfeeding and age at first solid food introduction.ConclusionsJust under half the infants with confirmed food hypersensitivity had no demonstrable IgE. In an exploratory analysis, risk factors for this phenotype of food hypersensitivity differed from those for IgE-mediated food allergy except for a healthy infant diet which was associated with less risk for both phenotypes.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13601-016-0089-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Dietary variety and food group consumption in children consuming a cows' milk exclusion diet

“…On a practical level, it is perceived as more convenient and portable (26); therefore, it may be that infants with CME are fed these foods as it is difficult to source guaranteed cows' milk free meals and snacks when eating away from the home. Previous research has reported that a 'healthier eating' dietary pattern, higher in fruit, vegetables and homemade foods, and lower in commercial baby foods was associated with a reduced prevalence of food allergy (6,7). The authors reported that this pattern may have a protective effect on the development of food allergy, rather than be a result of having a food allergy.…”

Should lip dosing be reconsidered when performing open food challenges?

“…The FAIR study comprised of two different types of cohorts: The FAIR birth cohort (n = 969) which was seen and challenged at 1, 2, 3, and 10/11 years of age (7)(8)(9). The FAIR school cohorts included 3 cohorts of children aged 6, 11 and 15 years (n = 798, 775 and 757 respectively) (8,11). In the FAIR birth cohort, 900 (92.9%), 858 (88.5%), 891 (92.0%) and 827 (85.4%) children were seen at 1, 2, 3, and 10/11 years of age respectively.…”

EAACI position paper on diet diversity in pregnancy, infancy and childhood: Novel concepts and implications for studies in allergy and asthma

“…[91][92][93][94][97][98][99] Dietary intake was assessed using FFQs, 73,116,117 24 hour recalls, 113 semi-quantitative questionnaires 112 and prospective food diaries. 114,118,119 (Table S5).…”