2022
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202103-364oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Ventilator-associated Events during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: JW performed all statistical analyses and primary drafting of the manuscript. All authors were involved in primary study design, results interpretation, critical review and final approval of the manuscript.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ARDS was the most common cause of VAEs in both COVID-19 waves, whereas before the COVID-19 pandemic most were caused by pneumonia and pulmonary edema. 6,7 The higher mortality rate among COVID-19 patients with VAEs during the second wave versus the first wave (60% vs 30%) may reflect the preference to defer intubation whenever possible during the second wave in favor of HFNC or noninvasive ventilation. Noninvasive ventilation and HFNC were used sparingly at our institutions and many others during the first wave for fear of aerosol generation and healthcare worker exposure, but their use rapidly expanded over time based on local experience and increasing evidence of safety and efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ARDS was the most common cause of VAEs in both COVID-19 waves, whereas before the COVID-19 pandemic most were caused by pneumonia and pulmonary edema. 6,7 The higher mortality rate among COVID-19 patients with VAEs during the second wave versus the first wave (60% vs 30%) may reflect the preference to defer intubation whenever possible during the second wave in favor of HFNC or noninvasive ventilation. Noninvasive ventilation and HFNC were used sparingly at our institutions and many others during the first wave for fear of aerosol generation and healthcare worker exposure, but their use rapidly expanded over time based on local experience and increasing evidence of safety and efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), was high. 6 Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.0.2 software (https://www.R-project.org/, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second explanation is that the infection definitions (e.g., VAP and VA-LRTI) used in these studies were different and not amenable to comparison. Another surveillance definition, ventilator-associated events (VAEs), has also been evaluated and shown higher VAEs per 100 episodes of ventilation, but similar VAEs rates per 1,000 ventilator-days in patients with COVID-19 versus those without COVID-19 ( 15 ). A third explanation is regarding the multiple limitations associated with all these studies done during the pandemic: no reporting and analysis accounting for standardized infection control measures, no collection of local baseline rates of VAP, no data on availability and turnover of hospital and ICU beds, adequacy of the number of healthcare providers needed for each hospital and ICU size, access to and training of personal protective equipment, and use of concomitant medications that may cause further immunosuppression (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 COVID-19 may predispose patients to ventilator-associated events although the extent to which this is due to complications of care vs progression of preexisting disease needs further elucidation. 97 Finally, researchers have found unexpected and marked decreases in the incidence of several non-COVID disease processes such as acute coronary syndromes and premature births during the pandemic era which may be related to delayed care but have not yet been fully explained, suggesting that stability of previous epidemiologic trends should not be presumed for any disease process, including sepsis. 98 99 As such, updated studies of the incidence of non-COVID sepsis during the pandemic are also needed.…”
Section: New Frontiers In Sepsis Epidemiology With the Global Covid-1...mentioning
confidence: 99%