2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence, Microbiological Studies, and Factors Associated With Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Erica J. Weinstein,
Alisa J. Stephens-Shields,
Craig W. Newcomb
et al.

Abstract: ImportanceDespite the frequency of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and clinical implications of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), knowledge gaps remain concerning the incidence, microbiological study results, and factors associated with these infections.ObjectivesTo identify the incidence rates, organisms isolated from microbiological studies, and patient and surgical factors of PJI occurring early, delayed, and late after primary TKA.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study obtained data from the US… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed PJI incidence in this study (~0.7% after 5 years) is lower than that sometimes reported. One possible explanation for this was the use of a specific ICD-10 code for the identification of PJI (T84.5), while in our studies that reported higher PJI rates (about 2.5% over 5 years), additional ICD-10 codes were employed to identify PJI, for example, T81.4 (infection following a procedure) and T84.7 (infection and inflammatory reaction due to other internal orthopaedic prosthetic devices, implants and grafts) 33 ; however, such codes appear less specific as, for example, T81.4 may lead to considering a superficial infection of the surgical wound as a PJI, while M00 corresponds to a diagnosis of pyogenic arthritis. 5 When using only the presence of ICD-10 code T84.5, the PJI incidence at 5 years observed in this study is similar to the 0.89% previously reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The observed PJI incidence in this study (~0.7% after 5 years) is lower than that sometimes reported. One possible explanation for this was the use of a specific ICD-10 code for the identification of PJI (T84.5), while in our studies that reported higher PJI rates (about 2.5% over 5 years), additional ICD-10 codes were employed to identify PJI, for example, T81.4 (infection following a procedure) and T84.7 (infection and inflammatory reaction due to other internal orthopaedic prosthetic devices, implants and grafts) 33 ; however, such codes appear less specific as, for example, T81.4 may lead to considering a superficial infection of the surgical wound as a PJI, while M00 corresponds to a diagnosis of pyogenic arthritis. 5 When using only the presence of ICD-10 code T84.5, the PJI incidence at 5 years observed in this study is similar to the 0.89% previously reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…entre os pacientes considerados de alto risco, como os diabéticos e hipertensos, para o desenvolvimento de ISC 16,20 . Adicionalmente, cita-se a relevância de mensurar, respectivamente, indicadores relacionados ao tempo dos processos operatórios e de internação, como a duração cirúrgica e de permanência hospitalar, pois estudos mostram que tempo operatório prolongado (≥2 horas) 21 e de internação hospitalar acima de cinco dias 22 são fatores relacionados à ocorrência de ISC, corroborando com os achados da presente pesquisa.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Author details 1 Service of Infectious Diseases, Cardarelli Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131 Naples, Italy. 2 Department of Public Health, Orthopedic Unit, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy. 3 Unit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total joint arthroplasty. Data obtained from the US Department of Veterans Affairs on a sample of around 80,000 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty identified a percentage of patients with PJI approaching 2%, with the highest number of PJI cases diagnosed within 24 months from primary knee arthroplasty [ 2 ]. Further data obtained by a meta-analysis including articles investigating the incidence of PJI after primary hip arthroplasty highlight an incidence approaching 1%, with the highest number of cases among people aged ≥ 70 years and a great difference in terms of incidence among different countries [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%