2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Apical Root Cracks and Apical Dentinal Detachments after Canal Preparation with Hand and Rotary Files at Different Instrumentation Lengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
96
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
96
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Published studies on this topic always embrace cutting procedures and postoperative observation through optical microscopy technique. Under this methodological approach, it has been stated that NiTi rotary preparation per se might have an etiological role in the creation of dentinal defects (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Although these studies seem experimentally sound at first sight, as most of control groups using non-prepared teeth showed, in most cases, no dentinal defects, the destructive approach of the method stands for its major drawback, since the preoperative condition of the dentin is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published studies on this topic always embrace cutting procedures and postoperative observation through optical microscopy technique. Under this methodological approach, it has been stated that NiTi rotary preparation per se might have an etiological role in the creation of dentinal defects (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Although these studies seem experimentally sound at first sight, as most of control groups using non-prepared teeth showed, in most cases, no dentinal defects, the destructive approach of the method stands for its major drawback, since the preoperative condition of the dentin is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,7] Liu et al, reported that 25% of roots have shown defect or cracks which were instrumented using ProTaper. [8] Hin et al reported that ProTaper caused cracks in 35% of roots instrumented with it. [9] Kansal et al in his study also concluded that ProTaper when used in full sequence results in more microcracks formation than the other systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu tip sistemlerde ortaya çıkan bu sonucun, şekillendirme esnasında aletlerin kök kanallarında oluşturdukları döngüsel kuvvetlerin etkisi ile ortaya çıktığı düşünülebilir. 46 Kök dentininde bu şekilde oluşan hasarların dereceleri, kullanılan aletlerin sabit veya artan açılanmasına, çapraz kesit geometrisine, yiv formuna ve uç tasarımına göre değişiklik göster-ebilir. 46 PTG grubu, OSNG grubuna göre daha düşük kök dentin dayanım değerlerinin oluşmasına neden olmuş-tur.…”
Section: 27unclassified
“…46 Kök dentininde bu şekilde oluşan hasarların dereceleri, kullanılan aletlerin sabit veya artan açılanmasına, çapraz kesit geometrisine, yiv formuna ve uç tasarımına göre değişiklik göster-ebilir. 46 PTG grubu, OSNG grubuna göre daha düşük kök dentin dayanım değerlerinin oluşmasına neden olmuş-tur. Bu, döner aletlerin kök dentininde daha az mikro çat-lak oluşmasını sağlayan, kullanılan aletlerle kök dentini arasındaki temas alanı olarak tanımlanan radyal alandan kaynaklabilir.…”
Section: 27unclassified