1978
DOI: 10.1136/jech.32.2.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of cervical cancer by marital status.

Abstract: sumMARY The incidence of invasive cervical cancer by age and marital status was examined, using census statistics and 1968-71 cancer registry data for women who lived in the Manchester Regional Hospital Board area. The relative rarity of the disease in the unmarried and its higher incidence in formerly married than in currently married women was confirmed. This higher incidence was shown to be mainly in widows under 50 and divorced women, suggesting that it is related to the association of the disease with num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a positive association between being single and a pre-cancerous lesion. Similar findings were reported by Leck et al (1978)18. This could be explained by the fact that of those who were single, 59% had more than two sexual partners.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We found a positive association between being single and a pre-cancerous lesion. Similar findings were reported by Leck et al (1978)18. This could be explained by the fact that of those who were single, 59% had more than two sexual partners.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Such policies do not have to be "all or nothing" -indeed, none of the risk factors which could reasonably be used have a high enough relative risk to justify screening only a single group (Hakama et al, 1979), but they could include more frequent screening of certain subgroups. Several demographic variables are associated with increased disease risk: social class/occupation (Beral, 1974), marital status (Leck et al, 1978), parity (Miller et al, 1980). The prevalence and incidence of precursor lesions are also related to these variables (Sweetnam et al, 1981;Parkin et al, 1982b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%