1998
DOI: 10.1136/vr.143.24.649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds in England

Abstract: The annual incidence of clinical mastitis was measured in 144 Holstein/Friesian dairy herds in England (average size 132 cows) during 1994, 1995 and 1996 by means of carefully defined mastitis indices. The mean annual incidence of the disease over the three-year period was 43.4 quarter-cases per 100 cows, and the disease affected 25.9 per cent of the cows in the herds, with 1.6 quarter-cases per affected cow. In terms of cow-cases, the mean incidence was 39.9 cases per 100 cows in the herd and hence the ratio … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
47
3
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
8
47
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This of course does not question the physiological independence of each udder quarter. It was noted that the Ren rate obtained with the Orcival farm data (0.23 with a 95% confidence interval of (0.14; 0.35)) appeared consistent with the few data found in the literature (average rate in the United Kingdom: 18.3% for example [29]), considering that in practice, the type of germ incriminated was usually not documented for clinical mastitis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This of course does not question the physiological independence of each udder quarter. It was noted that the Ren rate obtained with the Orcival farm data (0.23 with a 95% confidence interval of (0.14; 0.35)) appeared consistent with the few data found in the literature (average rate in the United Kingdom: 18.3% for example [29]), considering that in practice, the type of germ incriminated was usually not documented for clinical mastitis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For Oltenacu et al [40], "rates of cure for clinical infections at each period and stage are: (a) during the dry period: 72% with strep, 51% with staph, and 65% with other types of organisms, (b) during the lactation period: 65% with strep, 45% with staph, and 60% with other types of organisms". These various approaches correspond to the current statement of veterinary epidemiologists, who are convinced that better knowledge and assessment of clinical mastitis condition in herds requires explicit consideration of the dependence between consecutive cases in assessment and prediction models [2,5,23,29,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Lameness prevalence was 12-87 % with the mean value of 27 ± 17 %. Esslemont & Kossaibati (1996) reported 24 % lameness in a survey of 90 herds in 1992-1993, while in another survey (Kossaibati & Esslemont, 1999), performed on 50 farms during 1995-1996, lameness reached 38%. Herd lameness has been estimated at 22 % by recent studies in the UK (Whay, 2003) and Wisconsin, USA (Cook, 2003) and Clarkson et al (1996).…”
Section: Lamenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach makes it possible to take into consideration the relative effectiveness of antibiotic treatments applied during lactation following an episode of mastitis [32,42] or during the drying off period, treatments that do not systematically ensure that the udder will recover bacteriologically [23,38]. The new idea introduced to take into account the possible relationship between consecutive lactations is simply based on assessing the health status of the udder at calving: "infected" or "not infected".…”
Section: Biological Model Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%