2015
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i2.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant women from Rural Background Attending Antenatal Care Clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study done by Gupta in Jaipur, incidence of gestational diabetes is 3.3% and maximum in age more than 36 years which is comparable to prevalence in present study of 3.7% and also association of GDM with increasing age in present study. 6 A comparable prevalence of 2.2% GDM is seen in study by Verges et al also. 7 In a study by Nahum, 25 patients out of 255 had gestational diabetes and 96% of them were identified by screening at 16 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In a study done by Gupta in Jaipur, incidence of gestational diabetes is 3.3% and maximum in age more than 36 years which is comparable to prevalence in present study of 3.7% and also association of GDM with increasing age in present study. 6 A comparable prevalence of 2.2% GDM is seen in study by Verges et al also. 7 In a study by Nahum, 25 patients out of 255 had gestational diabetes and 96% of them were identified by screening at 16 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Studies from Delhi and Manipur reported prevalences of 1.5% and 1% [ 12 , 14 ], respectively, using the 100g ADA criteria, but prevalence of abnormality on the initial step of the screening test, which is most similar to the DIPSI used in our study, was close to 10%. Rural studies in Kashmir had a prevalence of 2.4%, in Jaipur 3.3%, in Mysuru 3.7%, and in Coimbatore 2.1% [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. However, the last three studies may have had an artificially low prevalence because of the inclusion of women in 1 st trimester.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing maternal age is a proven risk factor for GDM. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] However, the exact cut-off at which risk becomes pertinent is still unclear. Many studies identified high GDM risk among subjects aged 30 years and above [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] whereas few studies reported age > 25 years as a significant risk factor for GDM.…”
Section: Non-modifiablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] However, the exact cut-off at which risk becomes pertinent is still unclear. Many studies identified high GDM risk among subjects aged 30 years and above [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] whereas few studies reported age > 25 years as a significant risk factor for GDM. [18][19][20] In addition, many researchers reported high GDM risk among those attaining early menarche.…”
Section: Non-modifiablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation