2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1008-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of immediate postpartum hemorrhages in French maternity units: a prospective observational study (HERA study)

Abstract: BackgroundMost estimates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) are calculated from studies that use administrative or medical birth databases, and only a few from prospective observational studies.Our principal objective was to estimate the incidence of PPH according to their severity (mild or severe) in vaginal deliveries (>500 mL, ≥1000 mL) and cesareans (>1000 mL and ≥1500 mL). The secondary objectives were to describe the incidence of PPH according to maternity unit characteristics, causes, and types of PPH manag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 830 women die from pregnancy or birth-related complications globally every day 1 , with postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) being the major cause 2 . The incidence of PPH is difficult to quantify due to different definitions and methods used to estimate blood loss, but recent large studies, where PPH is defined as a blood loss of ≥ 500 millilitres (ml), report a PPH rate of 1.2-9% [3][4][5][6][7] , with the highest rates in sub-Saharan Africa 7 . Variations in the inclusion and exclusion criteria of these studies may also contribute to disparity in the PPH rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Approximately 830 women die from pregnancy or birth-related complications globally every day 1 , with postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) being the major cause 2 . The incidence of PPH is difficult to quantify due to different definitions and methods used to estimate blood loss, but recent large studies, where PPH is defined as a blood loss of ≥ 500 millilitres (ml), report a PPH rate of 1.2-9% [3][4][5][6][7] , with the highest rates in sub-Saharan Africa 7 . Variations in the inclusion and exclusion criteria of these studies may also contribute to disparity in the PPH rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massive or severe PPH is defined variously as a blood loss ≥ 1,000 ml 4,7,8 or ≥ 1,500 ml 9,10 ; bleeding requiring a blood transfusion 5 ; or bleeding requiring ≥ 8 bags of red blood cells 11,12 . The average rate for severe PPH is 1.2%, with a range of 0.02-4.5%, depending on how PPH is defined 4,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12] . The most common cause of severe PPH, responsible for 27% of all maternal deaths 2 , is uterine atony, which is the failure of the uterus to contract after the birth of a baby 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These risk factors could be identi ed by maternal medical history, maternal check-ups, or ultrasound examinations before labor starts. Meanwhile, the most common etiology of PPH was uterine atony [11,12], which accounts for 70%-80% of PPH cases [13,14]. Seemingly obstetrically low-risk women who do not have any of the above-mentioned risk factors may suddenly develop atonic PPH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentages were related with the use of partograph sheets atthe second stage of labor, active management at the third stage which is very important in preventing bleeding around 60-70%, including administration of oxytocin, controlled cord stretching and uterine fundal massage. Furthermore, monitoring the IV stage until 2 hours of postpartum include: pulse, blood pressure, bladder, temperature, and bleeding period is the most urgent thing to prevent maternal and infant mortality (Adnan, 2017;Rani & Begum, 2017;Sentilhes et al, 2015;Egenberg, 2017;Guasch & Gilsanz, 2016;Herrick, Mvundura, Burke, & Abu-Haydar,2017;Nyflot et al, 2017;Francoise et al,2016;Mobeen et al, 2010;Mezmur, 2017;Mandiwa, 2017;Zalalem, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%