2020
DOI: 10.47275/2690-862x-108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Discharges Related to Electromagnetic Interferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Years of enrolment for the studies ranged from 2010 to 2020. Numerous case reports on direct magnet application in S-ICD patients exist, with many of them occurring in older devices and IAS [17,18,[27][28][29][30]. But, only a few prospective reports with a small number of patients have been published, revealing no relevant adverse events in patients with IAS [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Years of enrolment for the studies ranged from 2010 to 2020. Numerous case reports on direct magnet application in S-ICD patients exist, with many of them occurring in older devices and IAS [17,18,[27][28][29][30]. But, only a few prospective reports with a small number of patients have been published, revealing no relevant adverse events in patients with IAS [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnets are readily available and do not require special training to use, making them an excellent option to reprogram S-ICD devices in emergency situations. In general, the application of a magnet switches pacemakers to an asynchronous pacing mode and suspends all antitachycardia therapies of T-ICD [17][18][19][20][21][22]. In S-ICD instead, magnet application suspends the shock therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%