2022
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of lymph node metastasis in early-stage low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a systematic review

Abstract: ObjectiveThe objective of this systematic review was to assess the incidence of lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically presumed early-stage low-grade serous ovarian cancer that underwent primary surgical treatment.MethodsThis study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022308923). A systematic literature review was conducted following the Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) checklist. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid, and Scopus datab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Involvement of pelvic lymph nodes in gynecological cancer is one of the most important factors for a poor prognosis [8][9][10][11] . Approximately 5-30% of women with early-stage gynecological cancer have pelvic lymph-node metastasis, and the probability of having such metastasis seems to be even higher in advanced stages [27][28][29][30] . However, the identification of pelvic lymph nodes is not an easy task.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findings In Clinical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Involvement of pelvic lymph nodes in gynecological cancer is one of the most important factors for a poor prognosis [8][9][10][11] . Approximately 5-30% of women with early-stage gynecological cancer have pelvic lymph-node metastasis, and the probability of having such metastasis seems to be even higher in advanced stages [27][28][29][30] . However, the identification of pelvic lymph nodes is not an easy task.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findings In Clinical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%