primarily because of the successful development of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) [1][2][3]. ER is minimally invasive and preserves the entire stomach, resulting in a better postoperative quality of life for patients [4,5]. ER is indicated for tumors with a negligible risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis [6]. Although the indications for ER specifi ed by the Japanese treatment guidelines are strictly limited to small mucosal tumors with differentiated histology (D-type), expanded indications for some D-type lesions (intramucosal cancers either ≤3 cm in size with no lymphatic-vascular capillary involvement regardless of ulceration fi ndings or with no ulceration regardless of tumor size) have been proposed and accepted by high-volume ER centers [2,6,7].It remains in dispute, however, as to which undifferentiated-type (UD-type) EGC lesions involve a negligible risk of LN metastasis. We recently published a study in which 3843 cases of surgically resected UD-type EGCs were examined, with particular emphasis placed on investigating the existence of LN metastasis [8]. Of those cases, 310 tumors satisfi ed our recently proposed criteria (lesion size ≤2 cm and no ulcerative component or lymphatic-vascular capillary involvement), with none of them having any LN metastasis. The risk of metastasis from such tumors was calculated to be 0-0.96% and we have proposed this as a new category of expanded criteria for ESD. Much to our surprise, immediately after the publication of this proposal, however, we encountered a patient satisfying all the expanded criteria based on routine histological examination, but who had, nonetheless, LN metastasis.
Case reportA 58-year-old asymptomatic Japanese woman underwent screening abdominal ultrasonography that Abstract A 58-year-old woman was found to have a 45-mm abdominal mass adjacent to the pancreas on screening ultrasonography, and subsequent esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a small gastric cancer (13 mm in diameter). We initially performed endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and routine histological examination of the specimen sectioned at 2-mm intervals revealed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma confi ned to the mucosa without lymphatic-vascular capillary involvement or ulceration. These fi ndings satisfi ed the expanded criteria for ESD we reported recently. We next performed laparoscopic excisional biopsy of the abdominal mass, and histological examination with immunohistochemical staining revealed a metastatic lymph node (LN) resulting from the gastric cancer. Distal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy was then performed and histological examination indicated no residual cancer cells or any additional LN metastases. After the above-described clinical course, further analysis was conducted because of the highly unusual nature of this case; 60 additional deep-cut sections from the resected specimen were performed, with one section showing lymphatic involvement in the mucosa on hematoxylin and eosin staining. This case suggests p...