2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0598-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of mosaicism in 1055 de novo NF2 cases: much higher than previous estimates with high utility of next-generation sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Lymphocyte variant detection rates vary based on founder versus non‐founder status because of the high rate of somatic mosaicism in NF2. Although many reports have published somatic mosaicism in up to 30% of simplex cases (Moyhuddin et al., 2003), the recent use of next‐generation sequencing suggests mosaicism to be as high as 60% in first‐generation affected individuals (Evans, Hartley et al, 2019; Evans et al, 2019). Therefore, careful consideration of laboratory methodology and cautious interpretation of seemingly uninformative results are necessary.…”
Section: Genetic Counseling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lymphocyte variant detection rates vary based on founder versus non‐founder status because of the high rate of somatic mosaicism in NF2. Although many reports have published somatic mosaicism in up to 30% of simplex cases (Moyhuddin et al., 2003), the recent use of next‐generation sequencing suggests mosaicism to be as high as 60% in first‐generation affected individuals (Evans, Hartley et al, 2019; Evans et al, 2019). Therefore, careful consideration of laboratory methodology and cautious interpretation of seemingly uninformative results are necessary.…”
Section: Genetic Counseling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing these has become straightforward since moving from Sanger to Next Generation sequencing (NGS) where identification of low DNA allele frequencies has been substantially enhanced. This has been shown to be very valuable in identifying underlying mosaic variants in monogenic conditions such as NF2 [34]. However, there is a particular pitfall in TP53 testing as well as for a number of other genes such as PPM1D and several oncogenes.…”
Section: Tp53 Allele Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our studies on neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1; MIM# 162200) and type 2 (NF2; MIM# 10100), which are two distinct tumor suppressor gene disorders, have revealed frequent mosaicism among de novo patients (Kehrer‐Sawatzki et al, 2004; Kluwe et al, 2003). A recent study estimated a 60% frequency for mosaicism in de novo NF2 patients (Evans et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%